La influencia de la negación anaxagórica de la génesis en la física aristotélica

The influence of the Anaxagorean denial of the génesis in Aristotelian physics

Authors

  • María Elena Díaz Universidad de Buenos Aires – Buenos Aires – Argentina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_32_15

Keywords:

Anaxagoras, Aristotle, génesis, Aristotelian physics

Abstract

This work delves into one of Aristotle's basic strategies in Physics I, the homogenization of disparate concepts of the first physicists, as part of the construction of his taxonomy of positions on principles. This propaedeutic strategy of the refutation consists in the assembly of a progression and a genealogy of the positions of the physicists from Eleatism. The main objective of this work is to show the specific meaning of the concept of separation in Anaxagoras' physics and the transformations that undergoes under Aristotelian criticism. In line with recent works such as those of Curd (2019) and Marmodoro (2017) that have drawn attention to the specificity of Anaxagoras' physical vocabulary, this research shows that the bases of his denial of genesis and its reworking in terms of separation and mix rest on original theses of his own physics. Both terminologically and conceptually, the notions of Anaxagorean separation and mixing cannot be exported to another physical theory.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BARNES, J. (1982). The Presocratic Philosophers. New York, Routledge.

BASTIT, M. (2002). Les quatre causes de l'être selon la philosophie première d'Aristote. Louvain-la-Neuve, Peeters.

BERTI, E. (1991). Les méthodes d’argumentation et de démostration dans la Physique (apories, phénomènes, principes), La Physique d’Aristote et les conditions d’une science de la nature. Paris, Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin, 1991, p. 53-72.

BOERI, M. (2006). Aristóteles contra Parménides: el problema del cambio y la posibilidad de una ciencia física. Tópicos 30 bis, p. 45-68.

BOLTON, R. (1995). Aristotle’s Method in Natural Science: Physics I. In: JUDSON, L. (ed.), Aristotle’s Physics. A Collection of Essays. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

CALVO MARTÍNEZ, T. (2000). La noción de Physis en los orígenes de la filosofía griega. Δαίμων. Revista de filosofía, n. 21, p. 21-38.

CARTER, J. (2018). How Aristotle Changes Anaxagoras’s Mind. Apeiron 52, p. 1-28.

CHERNISS, H. (1935). Aristotle's criticism of presocratic philosophy. Baltimore, The Johns Hopkins Press.

CLEVE, F. (1973). The Philosophy of Anaxagoras. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff.

COOPER, J. (2012). Conclusion and Retrospect: Metaphysics A.10. In: STEEL, C.; PRIMAVESI, O. (eds.), Aristotle’s Metaphysics Alpha: Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 336–365.

CORDERO, N. (2011). Una consecuencia inesperada de la reconstrucción actual del Poema de Parménides. Hypnos 27, p. 222-229.

CURD, P., (2007). Anaxagoras of Clazomenae: Fragments. Text and Translation with Notes and Essays. Toronto, University of Toronto Press.

CURD, P., (2019). Anaxagoras. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2019 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/anaxagoras/. Accessed on 05/08/2020

GRAHAM, D. W. (1994). The Postulates of Anaxagoras. Apeiron 27, p. 77–121.

GOMES, G. (2016). The philosopher, his predecessors, the commentator and his critics: on the criticism of Harold Cherniss’s critique of Aristotle as a source for early Greek philosophy. Anais de Filosofia Clássica 10, n. 19, p. 76-93.

GUTHRIE, W. K. C. (1957). Aristotle as a Historian of Philosophy: Some Preliminaries. Journal of Hellenic Studies, n. 77, p. 35–41

GUTHRIE, W. (1965). A History of Greek Philosophy, vol. II. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

MANSFELD, J. (2010). Aëtius, Aristotle and Others on Coming-to-be and Passing-away. Aëtiana: The Method and Intellectual Context of a Doxographer, vol. III. Leiden, Brill, p. 415-446.

MARMODORO, A. (2015). Anaxagoras’s Qualitative Gunk. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 23, p. 402–422.

MARMODORO, A., (2017). Everything in Everything: Anaxagoras’s Metaphysics. New York, Oxford University Press.

NADDAF, G. (2005). The Greek concept of nature. Albany, State University of New York Press.

O’BRIEN, D. (1968). The Relation of Anaxagoras and Empedocles. The Journal of Hellenic Studies 88, p. 93-113.

PALMER, J. (2009). Parmenides and Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford, Oxford University Press.

RUNIA, D. T. (2008). The Sources for Presocratic Philosophy. In: CURD, P.; GRAHAM, D., The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 27–54.

SEDLEY, D. (2007). Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. Berkley: University of California Press

SISKO, J. E. (2013). Anaxagoras and Empedocles in the Shadow of Elea. In: Warren, J.; Sheffield, F. (eds.) Routledge Companion to Ancient Philosophy. London, Routledge, p. 49-64.

SPANGENBERG, P. (2017). La torsión eleática: la dialéctica fuerte ejercida por Platón y Aristóteles frente al adversario monista. Hypnos 39, p. 220 – 237.

THANASSAS, P. (2007). Parmenides, Cosmos, and Being: A Philosophical Interpretation. Milwaukee, Marquette University Press.

WILLIAMS, C. J. F. (1982) Aristotle’s De Generatione et Corruptione. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

ZELLER, E. (1892). Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung, i. Vorsokratische Philosophie. Zweite Hälfte. 5th ed. Leipzig, O. R. Reisland.

Published

2022-06-10

How to Cite

Díaz , M. E. . (2022). La influencia de la negación anaxagórica de la génesis en la física aristotélica: The influence of the Anaxagorean denial of the génesis in Aristotelian physics. Revista Archai, (32), e03215. https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_32_15

Issue

Section

Dossier Archai: Dialectic and Refutation in Plato and Aristotle