Aristotle on μετὰ λόγου capacities and voluntary animal locomotion part two: freedom, scientific knowledge and voluntary locomotion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_35_26Keywords:
Aristotle, Voluntary, Locomotion, CapacititesAbstract
According to the dominant interpretation of the distinction between capacities that are “without-λόγος” (ἄλογοι) and capacities that are “with-λόγος” (μετὰ λόγου, Met., IX 2,1046a34-b2), the latter would be unique to human beings. We can find four arguments in defense of that thesis in the secondary bibliography. In a previous paper I dealt with two of these arguments, which I called the psychic arguments. This article deals with the other two and presents a positive argument for the alternative reading that tries to make it seem plausible - although not unassailable - in light of its own merits. According to this alternative reading, it is with the framework provided by Aristotle to explain the functioning of bidirectional capacities that we must explain the functioning of the capacity responsible for producing voluntary locomotion in all animals.
Downloads
References
Alessandro di Afrodisia. 2007. Commentario alla Metafisica di Aristotele. Milano: Bompiani.
Aquinas, St. Th. 1961. Commentary on the Metaphysics of Aristotle, Vol. II. Chicago: H. Regnery Company.
———. 1999. Commentary on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by C. I. Litzinger. Notre Dame: Dumb Ox.
Aristóteles. 2004. Metafísica, Livros IX e X. Translated by L. Angioni. São Paulo: IFCH/UNICAMP.
Aristotle. 1926. The Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by H. Rackham. London: Harvard University Press.
———. 1932. Politics. Translated by H. Rackham. London: Harvard University Press.
———. 1935. The Athenian Constitution, the Eudemian Ethics, On Virtues and Vices. Translated by H. Rackham. London: Harvard University Press.
———. 1957. On the Soul ; Parva Naturalia ; On Breath. Translated by W. S Hett. London: Harvard University Press.
———. 1975. The Nicomachean Ethics, Translated with a Commentary and Glossary. Translated by H. G. Apostle. London: Reidel.
———. 1983. Physics, Books III and IV: Translated with Introduction and Notes by Edward Hussey. Clarendon Aristotle Series. New York: Oxford University Press.
———. 1991. History of animals, Volume III: Books 7-10. Translated by D. M Balme and J. Lennox. London: Harvard University Press.
———. 2001. On the Parts of Animals: Translated with an Introduction and Commentary by James G. Lennox. Clarendon Aristotle Series. New York: Oxford University Press.
———. 2003. Metaphysics: Books 1-9. Translated by H. Tredennick. Reprint. The Loeb classical library 271. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.
———. 2020. “De Motu Animalium.” In Aristotle’s De Motu Animalium: Symposium Aristotelicum, edited by C. Rapp, translated by O. Primavesi and B. Morison. Oford: Oxford University Press. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198835561.001.0001.
Aspasius. 2014. On Aristotle Nicomachean Ethics 1-4, 7-8. Translated by D. Konstan. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Beere, J. 2009. Doing and Being an Interpretation of Aristotle’s Metaphysics Theta. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bobzien, S. 2014a. “Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics 1113b7-8 and Free Choices.” In What Is up to Us? Studies on Agency and Responsibility in Ancient Philosophy, edited by P. Destrée, R. Salles, and M. A. Zingano, 59–74. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.
———. 2014b. “Choice and Moral Responsibility (NE Iii 1–5).” In The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, edited by R. M. Polansky, 81–109. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Brown, L. 2009. “Explanatory Notes.” In The Nicomachean Ethics, Translated by David Ross, Revised with an Introduction and Noted by Leslie Brown, by Aristotle, translated by D. Ross, 204–68. New York: Oxford University Press.
Carron, P. 2019. “Aristotle on Blaming Animals: Taking the Hardline Approach on Voluntary Action in the Nicomachean Ethics III.1–5.” Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 23 (2): 381–97. https://doi.org/10.5840/epoche2019131129.
Coope, U. 2021. “Aristotle on Productive Understanding and Completeness.” In Productive Knowledge in Ancient Philosophy: The Concept of Technê, edited by T. K. Johansen, 109–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corcilius, K. 2020. “De Anima III 7: The Actuality Principle and the Triggering of Mental Episodes.” In Aristote et l’ame Humaine. Lectures de “de Anima” III Offertes a Michel Crubellier, edited by G. Guyomarc’h, C. Louguet, and C. Murgier, 185–220. Leuven: Peeters Publishers & Booksellers.
Corcilius, K., and P. Gregoric. 2013. “Aristotle’s Model of Animal Motion.” Phronesis 58 (1): 52–97.
Echeñique, J. 2014. “Aristotle’s Appraisability Compatibilism and Accountability Incompatibilism.” In What Is up to Us? Studies on Agency and Responsibility in Ancient Philosophy, edited by P. Destrée, R. Salles, and M. A. Zingano, 91–106. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.
Frede, D. 2014. “Free Will in Aristotle?” In What Is up to Us? Studies on Agency and Responsibility in Ancient Philosophy, edited by P. Destrée, R. Salles, and M. A. Zingano, 39–58. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.
Gauthier, R. A., and J. Y. Jolif. 2002. L’ ethique à Nicomaque, commentaire Livres I-V. Vol. II, I. Paris: Éditions Peeters/ Nauwelaerts.
Grant, A. 1885. The Ethics of Aristotle, Illustrated with Essays and Notes. Vol. 2. London: Longmans, Green.
Heinaman, R. 1986. “The Eudemian Ethics on Knowledge and Voluntary Action.” Phronesis 31 (1): 128–47.
Irwin, T. 1980. “Reason and Responsibility in Aristotle.” In Essays on Aristotle’s Ethics, edited by A. Rorty, 117–55. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kane, R. 2005. A Contemporary Introduction to Free Will. New York: Oxford University Press.
Labarrière, J.-L. 2004. Langage, vie politique et mouvement des animaux: études aristotéliciennes. Paris: Vrin.
Makin, S. 1996. “Megarian Possibilities.” Philosophical Studies 83 (3): 253–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00364608.
———. 2006. Aristotle, Metaphysics: Book Theta. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Meyer, S. S. 2014. “Aristotle on What Is up to Us and What Is Contingent.” In What Is up to Us? Studies on Agency and Responsibility in Ancient Philosophy, edited by P. Destrée, R. Salles, and M. A. Zingano, 75–90. Sankt Augustin: Academia Verlag.
Pearson, G. 2012. Aristotle on Desire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ross, W. D. 1924. Aristotle’s Metaphysics, A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary by W. D. Ross. Vol. II. Books Z-N. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
———. 2005. Aristotle. Hoboken: Taylor & Francis Ltd.
Sharples, R. W. 1976. “Responsibility and the Possibility of More Than One Course of Action: A Note on Aristotle De Caelo Ii.12.” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 23 (1): 69–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-5370.1976.tb00353.x.
Sorabji, R. 1993. Animal Minds and Human Morals: The Origins of the Western Debate. N.Y: Cornell University Press.
Suárez, F. 1960. Disputaciones metafísicas. Translated by S. Rábade Romeo. Vol. 3. Madrid: Editorial Gredos.
Taylor, C. C. W. 2006. “Commentary.” In Nicomachean Ethics, Books II-IV: Translated with an Introduction and Commentary by C. C. W. Taylor, 59–238. Clarendon Aristotle Series. New York: Oxford University Press.
Zingano, M. A. de A. 2008. “Comentários.” In Ethica nicomachea I 13 - III 8: tratado da virtude moral, 75–210. São Paulo: Odysseus.
———. 2009. “L’Acte Volontaire et La Théorie Aristotélicienne de l’Action.” Journal of Ancient Philosophy 3 (2): 1–18.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Daniel Nascimento
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.
1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.
