An Interdisciplinary Model of Context Morphology

  • Dániel Levente Pál Eötvös Loránd University
  • Bálint Daróczy Institute of Computer Science and Control, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, and Eötvös Loránd University


Using an abstract graph model we describe a hypothetical transformation of a literary entity through the active connections in the graph. First, we weakly define a set of transformations (“morphology”) over a particular entity as a series of the recent activities distinguishing them into categories according to their effect on the entity. Second, to our conjecture, the emerging paths of forms are slowly abandoning the original “birth context”, shaping a decreased, cleaned set of entities, to replace the gap with entities derived from the dynamic set of “recipient context”.


  • Abstract viewed = 41 times
  • HTML viewed = 8 times
  • PDF viewed = 21 times


Download data is not yet available.


AARSETH, Espen J. (1997). Cybertext: Perspectives of Ergodic Literature. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

BARABÁSI, Albert-László (2002). Linked. New York: Perseus Books Group.

BARABÁSI, Albert-László, Réka Albert (1999). “Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks.” Science 286.5439: 509-512. 1 Jul. 2016.,%20509-512%20(1999).pdf.

BARTHES, Roland (1970). S/Z. Paris: Seuil.

BARTHES, Roland (1986). “From Work to Text.” The Rustle of Language. Roland Barthes. Trans. by Richard Howard. New York: Hill and Wang. 56-64.

BILSKY, Manuel (1953). “The Significance of Locating the Art Object.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 13.4: 531-536.

BONATI, Félix Martínez (1960). La estructura de la obra literaria. Santiago de Chile: Universidad de Chile.

CAIMO, Alberto, and Nial Friel (2011). “Bayesian Inference for Exponential Random Graph Models.” Social Networks 33: 41-55.

CHENG, Justin (2014). “Can Cascades Be Predicted?” WWW 2014 – Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. 925-936.

CORTES, Corinna, Vladimir Vapnik (1995). “Support-vector Networks.” Machine Learning 20: 273-297.

DAMROSCH, David (2003). What is World Literature? Princeton: Princeton University Press.

DARÓCZY, Bálint (2013). “Fisher Kernels for Image Descriptors: A Theoretical Overview and Experimental Results.” Annales Universitatis Scientiarum Budapestinensis de Rolando Eötvös Nominatae – Sectio Computatorica 40: 201-214.

DARÓCZY, Bálint (2015). “Text Classification Kernels for Quality Prediction over the C3 Data Set.” WWW 2015 – Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web. Geneva: International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee. 1441-1446.

DAVIES, David (1996). “Interpretive Pluralism and the Ontology of Art.” Revue Internationale de Philosophie 50.198: 577-592.

DAVIES, David (2007). Aesthetics and Literature. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.

DERRIDA, Jacques (1998). Of Grammatology. Trans. Gayatri Chakravorti Spivak. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

ERDŐS, Paul, and Alfréd Rényi (1959). “On Random Graphs.” Publicationes Mathematicae 6: 290–297.

ESKELINEN, Markku (2012). Cybertext Poetics: The Critical Landscape of New Media Literary Theory. London: Continuum.

FOUCAULT, Michel (1969). L’archéologie du savoir [The Archeaology of Knowledge]. Paris: Éditions Gallimard.

FRANK, Ove, and David Strauss (1986). “Markov Graphs.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 81: 832-842.

GADAMER, Hans-Georg (2004). Igazság és módszer [Truth and Method]. Trans. Gábor Bonyhai. Budapest: Osiris.

GARZÓ, András (2013). “Cross-lingual Web Spam Classification.” WWW 2013 Companion – Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web. Republic and Canton of Geneva (Switzerland): International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee. 1149-1156.

GENETTE, Gérard (1992). The Architect: An Introduction. Trans. by Jane E. Lewin. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.

GENETTE, Gérard (1997a). Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree. Trans. by Channa Newman and Claude Doubinsky. Lincoln, NB: University of Nebraska Press.

GENETTE, Gérard (1997b). Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Trans. by Jane E. Lewin. Lincoln NE and London: University of Nebraska Press.

INGARDEN, Roman (1931). Das literarische Kunstwerk: Eine Untersuchung aus dem Grenzgebiet der Ontologie, Logik und Literaturwissenschaft. Halle: Max Niemeyer.

INGARDEN, Roman (1973). The Literary Work of Art: An Investigation on the Borderlines of Ontology, Logic, and Theory of Literature. Trans. George G. Grabowicz. Northwestern University Press.

JAUSS, Hans Robert (1982). Aesthetic Experience and Literary Hermeneutics. Trans. Michael Shaw. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

JAUSS, Hans Robert (1982b). Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Trans. Timothy Bahti. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

LANDOW, George P. (1992). Hypertext: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

LANDOW, George P. (1997). Hypertext 2.0: The Convergence of Contemporary Critical Theory and Technology. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

LANDOW, George P. (2006). Hypertext 3.0: Critical Theory and New Media in an Era of Globalisation. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

LEE, Felicia R. (2006). “A Layered Look Reveals Ancient Greek Texts.” The New York Times, Nov. 27. May 8 2016.

MCGANN, Jerome J. (2002). “Literary Scholarship in the Digital Future.” The Chronicle of Higher Education: The Chronicle Review 49.16: B7–B9.

MITIAS, Michael H. (1982). “The Ontological Status of the Literary Work of Art.” Journal of Aesthetic Education 16.4: 41–52.

MORETTI, Franco (2005). Graphs, Maps, Trees. London: Verso.

MORETTI, Franco (2013). Distant Reading: The Formation of an Unorthodox Literary Critic. London: Verso.

NEWMAN, Mark E. J. (2003). “The Structure and Function of Complex Networks.” SIAM Review 45.2: 167-256.

PÁL, Dániel Levente (2010). “Közelítés a kiberfilológiához” [Towards Cyberphilology]. Prae 4: 23-33.

PÁL, Dániel Levente (2012). “Szövegparadigmák – vektorok, hálózatok, önhasonló alakzatok” [Paradigms of Textuality – Vectors, Graphs, Fractals]. A szótól a szövegig [From Word to Text]. Ed. Vilmos Bárdosi. Tinta, Budapest. 193-199.

PÁL, Dániel Levente (2014). “Visualizations (Maps) & Visions (Metaphors) of the Internet.” 5th Visual Learning Conference: Pictures – Parables – Paradoxes. Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Department of Technical Education. Budapest, November 15, 2014. (in print).

RAMSAY, Stephen (2011). Reading Machines: Toward an Algorithmic Criticism. Chicago, IL: University of Illinois.

ROBINS, Garry et. al. (2007). “Recent Developments in Exponential Random Graph (p*) Models for Social Networks.” Social Networks 29: 192-215.

SHUSTERMAN, Richard (1984). The Object of Literary Criticism. Atlantic Highlands, N.J.: Humanities Press.

SIKLÓSI, Dávid et. al. (2012). “Content-Based Trust and Bias Classification via Biclustering.” Proceedings of the 2nd Joint WICOW/AIRWeb Workshop on Web Quality WebQuality’12. New York: Association for Computing Machinery. 41-47.

STAHL, Gerry (2010). Tacit and Explicit Understanding. Published by Gerry Stahl at, printed in the USA.

TABBI, Joseph (2010). “Electronic Literature as World Literature; or, The Universality of Writing under Constraint.” Poetics Today 31(1): 17-50.

WATTS, Duncan J., Steven H. Strogatz (1998). “Collective Dynamics of ‘Small-world’ Networks.” Nature 393.6684: 440-442.

WELLEK, René, Austin Warren (1949). Theory of Literature. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
How to Cite
PÁL, Dániel Levente; DARÓCZY, Bálint. An Interdisciplinary Model of Context Morphology. MATLIT: Materialities of Literature, [S.l.], v. 4, n. 2, p. 77-97, july 2016. ISSN 2182-8830. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 19 feb. 2018. doi:
Secção Temática | Thematic Section


graph; literary entity; context morphology; morphological space-time dynamics; metatheory; interdisciplinarity