The Heaviness of Light

  • Eugenio Tisselli ojoVoz

Abstract

This text explores the material implications of electronic reading and writing in the Anthropocene. It does so by briefly examining the consequences that the production and usage of electronic devices has on ecosystems and social contexts. Different perspectives on how a reader or writer may deal with the negative effects of sociotechnical systems are offered: restraint, pharmacological awareness and togetherness. Such perspectives can be transformed into reading and writing tools for the Anthropocene that may allow readers and writers of electronic literature to integrate the notion of an extended community, that is, an intimate and paradoxical complicity with nearby and remote humans and non-humans, and invite them into the digital text.

Keywords

community, technology, Anthropocene, pharmakon, writing

  • Abstract viewed = 84 times
  • PDF viewed = 50 times
  • HTML viewed = 107 times

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BERARDI, Franco (2012). The Uprising: On Poetry and Finance. Los Angeles, LA: Semiotext(e).

BURGIS, Tom (2015). The Looting Machine: Warlords, Tycoons, Smugglers and the Systematic Theft of Africa’s Wealth. London: William Collins.

Centro de Derechos Humanos Miguel Agustín Pro Juárez (2014). Manual Antiminero. Mexico: Centro ProDH.

COHEN, Anthony P. (1985). The Symbolic Construction of Community. Chichester: Ellis Horwood.

GUILLÉN VICENTE, Alfonso (2014). “El artículo 27 constitucional y la Reforma Energética.” Hechos y Derechos [Online] 1.19.

HARAWAY, Donna (2015). “Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene.” Environmental Humanities 6: 159-165.

HARAWAY, Donna (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

HARMAN, Graham (2013). Bells and Whistles. Winchester: Zero Books.

MARCUSE, Herbert (2010). El hombre unidimensional. Barcelona: Ariel.

MOORE, Jason (2017). “The Capitalocene, Part I: On the nature and origins of our ecological crisis.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 44.3: 594-630.

MORTON, Timothy (2012). “An object-oriented defense of poetry.” New Literary History 43.2: 205-224.

MORTON, Timothy (2013). Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

PARIKKA, Jussi (2014). The Anthrobscene. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

RIVERA GARZA, Cristina (2013). Los muertos indóciles. Necroescritura y desapropiación. México: Tusquets.

STIEGLER, Bernard (2015). Lo que hace que la vida merezca ser vivida. Madrid: Avarigani.

STIEGLER, Bernard (2016). The Automatic Society. Volume 1: The Future of Work. Transl. by Daniel Ross. Cambridge: Wiley, 2016.

SWANSTROM, Lisa (2016). “The Peripheral Future.” Electronic Book Review [Online]. April 3, 2016. 24 June 2017. http://www.electronicbookreview.com/thread/criticalecologies/peripheral

TISSELLI, Eugenio (2011). “Why I have stopped creating E-lit.” Netartery [Online]. November 25, 2011. 24 June 2017. http://netartery.vispo.com/?p=1211

TISSELLI, Eugenio (2014). “Sauti ya Wakulima: Listening to the Voice of Tanzanian Farmers.” Mobile Media Making in an Age of Smartphones. Ed. Marsha Berry and Max Schleser. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. 82-91.

STEFFEN, Will, Jacques Grinevald, Paul Crutzen, and John McNeill (2011). “The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A (Mathematical, Physical and
Engineering Sciences) 369: 842–867. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2010.0327
Published
2018-08-10
How to Cite
TISSELLI, Eugenio. The Heaviness of Light. MATLIT: Materialities of Literature, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 2, p. 11-25, aug. 2018. ISSN 2182-8830. Available at: <http://impactum-journals.uc.pt/matlit/article/view/5379>. Date accessed: 19 nov. 2018.
Section
Secção Temática | Thematic Section