Restoration and disintegration: the legacy of medical tradition in Plato's Philebus
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_35_31Keywords:
Hippocratic Corpus. Philebus. Disintegration. Pleasure. Method.Abstract
This study aims to examine the position of medicine within the context of Plato's dialogue Philebus, focusing, on one hand, on the critique the philosopher makes of medicine as a practice and craft governed by specific norms and procedures, and, on the other, on the skillful way in which he draws upon certain medical theories, adapting them to serve his own purposes. The first part of the analysis seeks to understand the reasons behind Plato’s critique of medicine in the Philebus, especially in passage 56b1, where he includes it among the activities that involve “much imprecision and little certainty.” This critique, as will be demonstrated, is closely related to the method of medicine. In this sense, it is important to highlight that, in criticizing medicine, Plato does not seek to establish a rivalry between philosophy and the medical practice, but rather to question medicine’s claim to sometimes present itself as the best and only modus vivendi. The second part of the study focuses on analyzing the influence of medicine on Plato’s theory of pleasure, particularly regarding the concept of pleasure as a process of fulfillment. To this end, Hippocratic texts such as On Diseases IV, On the Nature of Man, and On Ancient Medicine are consulted. Finally, through a comparison of recurring key terms, similarities and differences between the medical conception and Plato’s conception of pleasure are highlighted.
Downloads
References
Obras de Platão
PLATÃO. (1975). Fedro. Tradução de Carlos Alberto Nunes. Belém: UFPA.
________. (1974). Filebo. Tradução de Carlos Alberto Nunes. Belém: UFPA.
________. (2012). Filebo. Tradução de Fernando Muniz. São Paulo: Loyola.
________. (1991). Górgias. Tradução de Manuel Oliveira Pulquério. Coimbra: Universidade de Coimbra.
________. (1900). Opera. Recognovit breviqve adnotatione critica instrvxit: Iohannes Burnet. Tomvs II e III. Oxford: Typographeo Clarendoniano.
________. (1993). Philèbe. Texte établi e traduit par Auguste Diès. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
________. (2002). Philèbe. Traduction Jean-François Pradeau. Paris: Flammarion.
________. (1990). Philebus. Translated by Donald Davidson. New York/London: Garland Publishing.
________. (2014). República. Tradução de Anna Lia Amaral de Almeida Prado. 2ª edição. São Paulo: Ed. Martins Fontes.
________. (2011). Timeu-Crítias. Tradução do grego, introdução, notas e índices de Rodolfo Lopes. 1. ed. Coimbra: Centro de Estudos Clássicos e Humanísticos.
Obras do Corpus Hippocraticum
CORPUS HIPPOCRATICUM. (2005). Da natureza do homem. In: CAIRUS, Henrique; JÚNIOR, Wilson. Textos hipocráticos: o doente, o médico e a doença. Pp. 61-90. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FIOCRUZ.
________________________. (2005). Da doença sagrada. In: CAIRUS, Henrique; JÚNIOR, Wilson. Textos hipocráticos: o doente, o médico e a doença. Pp. 61-90. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FIOCRUZ.
_________________________. (2003). Sobre las enfermedades IV. In: BLANCO, María Eugenia. Tratados Hipocráticos VIII. Madrid: Editorial Gredos.
_________________________. (2024). Sobre a medicina antiga. Tradução de Rafael Huguenin, Rodrigo Pinto de Brito e Sussumo Matsui. Apresentação de Silvio Marino. São Paulo: UNESP.
Demais referências
AYACHE, L. (1999). «Le fonds médical du Philèbe». In: La fêlure du plaisir, vol. 2, édité par Monique Dixsaut. Paris: Vrin.
BHIKHA, R; GLYNN, J. (2017). The theory of humours revisited. In: International Journal of Development Research, v. 7, n. 09, p. 15029-15034.
CAIRUS, H. (1999). Da natureza do homem. Corpus hippocraticum. História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, v. 6, n. 2, p. 395–430, jul.
COLLINS, J. (2015). Exhortations to Philosophy: The Protreptics of Plato, Isocrates, and Aristotle. New York: Oxford University Press.
CRAIK, E. (2015). The ‘Hippocratic’ corpus: content and context. Abingdon: Routledge.
FOSTER, M. (1970). Lectures on the History of Physiology. During the 16th-18th Centuries. New York: Dover Publications.
GAYNES, R. (2011). Germ Theory: Medical Pioneers in Infectious Diseases. 1. ed. Washington, DC: ASM Press.
JOUANNA, J. (2012). Greek Medicine: From Hippocrates to Galen: Selected Papers. Leiden: Brill.
____________. (1990). Hippocrate: Tome II, Γ Partie - De l'ancienne médecine. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.
LOMBARD, J. (1999). Platon et la médecine. Le corps affaibli et l’âme attristée. Paris: L’Harmattan.
LONIE, I. (1981). The Hippocrates treatises “On generation”, “On the nature the child”, “Diseases IV”: a commentary. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter.
NUTTON, V. (2013). Ancient Medicine. New York: Routledge.
MARINO, S. (2018). Medicina. In: CORNELLI, G.; LOPES, R. (ed.). Platão. pp. 347-58. Coimbra-São Paulo: Coimbra University Press.
___________. (2016). The Style of Medical Writing in the Speech of Eryximachus: Imitation and Contamination. In: CORNELLI, G. (ed.), Plato’s Styles and Characters: Between Literature and Philosophy. pp. 241-252. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.
___________.; LO PRESTI, R. (2011). Dialégesthai: fisiologia di un atto. Interazioni fra lessico medico e lessico filosofico fra V e IV secolo (Corpus Hippocraticum e Platone). In: Journal of Ancient Philosophy Vol. V, 2.
MIHAI, C. (2021). Protreptic and Medicine in Plato’s Early Dialogues. In: Hermeneia. Journal of Hermeneutics, Art Theory & Criticism, Issue 26, p. 14-26.
VELANDIA, A. (2021). ¿Es Filolao el oponente del De prisca medicina?. In: Escritos, 29 (63): 264-286.
VEGETTI, M. (1995). La medicina in Platone. Venezia: Il Cardo.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Beatriz Saar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.
1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.
