Explanation and method in Eudemian Ethics I.6
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_20_8Keywords:
Methodology, Explanation, Ethics, Endoxa, AristotleAbstract
I discuss the methodological passage in the beginning of Ethica EudemiaI.6 (1216b26-35), which has received attention in connection with Aristotle’s notion of dialectic and his methodology in Ethics. My central focus is not to discuss whether Aristotle is prescribing and using what has been called the method of endoxa. I will focus on how this passage coheres with the remaining parts of the same chapter, which also are advancing methodological remarks. My claim is that the method of Ethica Eudemia I.6 is in agreement with many features of Aristotle’s theory of explanation as presented in the Posterior Analytics: Aristotle’s main concern is a warning against misuses of explanatory arguments.
Downloads
References
ANGIONI, L. (2013). Knowledge and Opinion about the same thing in APo I.33, Dois Pontos 10 (2), p.255-290 https://doi.org/10.5380/dp.v10i2.32184
ANGIONI, L. (2014). Demonstração, silogismo e causalidade. In: ANGIONI, L. (ed.). Lógica e Ciência em Aristóteles, Campinas, PHI, p. 61-120
BARNES, J. (1980). Aristotle and the method of ethics. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 133/134, p.490-511
BRONSTEIN, D. (2016). Aristotle on Knowledge and Learning. Oxford, Oxford UP https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198724902.001.0001
CHARLES, D. (2000). Aristotle on Meaning and Essence. Oxford, Oxford UP
COOPER, J. (1999). Aristotle on the Authority of Appearances. In: Reason and Emotion. Princeton, Princeton University Press
COOPER, J. (2009). Nicomachean Ethics VII.1-2: Introduction, Method, Puzzles. In: NATALI, C. (ed.). Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics Book VII, Symposium Aristotelicum. Oxford, OUP, p.9-39
DEVEREUX, D. (2015). Scientific and ethical methods in Aristotle’s Eudemian and Nicomachean Ethics. In: HENRY, D.; NIELSEN, C. M. (eds.). Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics. Cambridge, CUP, p.130-147 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511846397.008
FINE, G. (2010). Aristotle’s two worlds: knowledge and belief in Posterior Analytics I.33. Proceedings of Aristotelian Society 110 (3), p.23-346.https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199666164.003.0007
FREDE, D. (2012). The Endoxon Mystique: What Endoxa are and what they are not. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43, p.185-215 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:o
so/9780199666164.003.0007
KARBOWSKI, J. (2015). Endoxa, facts and the starting points of the Nicomachean Ethics. In: HENRY, D.;
NIELSEN, C. M. (eds.), Bridging the Gap between Aristotle’s Science and Ethics. Cambridge, CUP, p.113-129
KARBOWSKI, J. (2015b). Phainomena as Witnesses and Examples: The Methodology of Eudemian Ethics 1.6. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 49, p.193-226 https:// doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511846397.007
KENNY, A. (2011). Aristotle - The Eudemian Ethics. Oxford, OUP
INWOOD, B.; WOOLF, R. (2013). Aristotle: Eudemian Ethics. Cambridge, CUP
IRWIN, T. (1988). Aristotle’s First Principles. Oxford, OUP
LESHER, J. H. (2010). Saphêneia in Aristotle: Clarity, Precision and Knowledge. Apeiron 43, p.143-156 https:// doi.org/10.1515/APEIRON.2010.43.4.143
MENDONÇA, F. M. (2015). Tese de Doutorado. Os Tópicos e a Competência Dialética: Lógica e Linguagem na Codificação do Debate Dialético. Campinas, Universidade Estadual de Campinas
NATALI, C. (2010). Posterior Analytics and the definition of happiness in NE I. Phronesis 55 (4), p.304-324. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852810X523905
OWEN, G. E. L. (1961). Tithenai ta phainomena. In: MANSION, S. (ed.), Aristote et les problèmes de méthode, Louvain, p.83-103
WOODS, M. (1992). Eudemian Ethics - Books I, II and VIII. Oxford, OUP.
ZILLIG, R. (2012). O ‘melhor’ no âmbito da ação humana – Ética Eudêmia I.8. Dissertatio 36, p.299-316.
ZILLIG, R. (2013). O fim com vistas ao qual o homem escolhe viver: Ética Eudêmia I.5, 1215b15-16a10. Dois Pontos 10, n. 2, p.357-371. https://doi.org/10.5380/dp.v10i2.32252
ZILLIG, R. (2014). As relações entre o proêmio da Ética Eudêmia e o restante da obra: uma discussão a partir da análise de Ética Eudêmia I.7. Philósophos 19, n. 2, p.221-243 https://doi.org/10.5216/phi.v19i2.31268
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lucas Angioni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.
1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.
