A Aristotle’s Theory of Scientific Demonstration in Posterior Analytics 1.2-9 and 1.13

Keywords: Theory of Scientific Demonstration, scientific methodology, explanation, relevancy, Aristotle


I defend an interpretation of Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics Book I which distinguishes between two projects in different passages of that work: (i) to explain what a given science is and (ii) to explain what properly scientific knowledge is. I present Aristotle’s theory in answer to ii, with special attention to his definition of scientific knowledge in 71b9-12 and showing how this is developed on chapters 1.2-9 and 1.13 into a solid Theory of Scientific Demonstration. The main point of this theory is that demonstrations need to capture relevant explanations. Some formal requirements of the demonstration (as the syllogistic structure and coextension between terms) are unfoldings of the main project, 1.e., to capture and present properly relevant causal-explanatory relations.


Download data is not yet available.


ANGIONI, L. (2004). Aristóteles. Segundos Analíticos I. Tradução, introdução e notas. Clássicos da Filosofia: Cadernos de Tradução 7, p. 1-117.
ANGIONI, L. (2006). Introdução à Teoria da Predicação em Aristóteles. Campinas, Editora Unicamp.
ANGIONI, L. (2012). Os seis requisitos das premissas da demonstração científica em Aristóteles (Segundos Analíticos I 2). Manuscrito 35, n. 1, p. 7-60.
ANGIONI, L. (2014a). Demonstração, Silogismo e Causalidade. In: ANGIONI, L. (ed.). Lógica e Ciência em Aristóteles. Campinas, PHI, p. 61-120.
ANGIONI, L. (2014b). Aristotle on Necessary Principles and on Explaining X Through the Essence of X. Studia Philosophica Estonica 7, n. 2, p. 88-112.
ANGIONI, L. (2016). Aristotle’s Definition of Scientific Knowledge (APo 71b9-12). Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 19, p. 140-166.
ANGIONI, L. (2018). Causality and Coextensiveness in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics 1.13. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 54, p. 159-185.
ANGIONI, L. (no prelo). Aristóteles e a Necessidade do Conhecimento Científico. Discurso.
BARNES, J. (1993). Posterior Analytics. 2ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
BURNYEAT, M. (1981). Aristotle on Understanding Knowledge. In: BERTI, E. (ed.). Aristotle on Science – The Posterior Analytics. Padova, Antenore, p. 97-140.
BRONSTEIN, D. (2016). Aristotle on Knowledge and Learning. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
CHARLES, D. (2000). Aristotle on Meaning and Essence. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
CORKUM, P. (2016). Ontological Dependence and Grounding in Aristotle. Oxford Handbooks Online in Philosophy. Available at https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935314.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199935314-e-31?rskey=BYF7rI&result=3 . Accessed in 12/11/2019.
FEREJOHN, M. (1991). The origins of Aristotelian science. New Haven, Yale University Press.
FEREJOHN, M. (1994). The Immediate Premises of Aristotelian Demonstration. Ancient Philosophy 14, p. 79-97.
FREELAND, C. (1991). Accidental Causes and Real Explanations. In: JUDSON, L. (ed.). Aristotle’s Physics. Oxford, Clarendon Press, p. 49-72.
GILDERSLEEVE, B. (1900). Syntax of Classical Greek. New York, American Book Company.
GOLDIN, O. (2013). Circular Justification and Explanation in Aristotle. Phronesis 58, p. 195-214.
HOCUTT, M. (1974). Aristotle’s four becauses. Philosophy 49, p. 93-110.
KOSLICKI, K. (2012). Essence, necessity and explanation. In: TAHKO, T. (ed.). Contemporary Aristotelian Metaphysics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 187-206.
KOSMAN, L. A. (1973). Explanation, Understanding and Insight in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics. In: LEE, H.; MOURELATOS, A.; RORTY, R. (eds.). Exegesis and Argument. Assen, Van Gorcum, p. 374-392.
HASPER, P. S. (2006). Sources of delusion in Analytica Posteriora I 5. Phronesis 51, p. 252-284.
MCKIRAHAN, R. (1992). Principles and Proofs – Aristotle’s Theory of Demonstrative Science. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
MORAVCSIK, J. M. (1974). Aristotle on Adequate Explanations. Synthese 28, p. 3-17.
MORAVCSIK, J. M. (1991). What Makes Reality Intelligible? Reflections on Aristotle’s Theory of Aitia. In: JUDSON, L. (ed.). Aristotle’s Physics. Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 31-47.
PORCHAT PEREIRA, O. (2000). Ciência e Dialética em Aristóteles. São Paulo, Fundação Editora da Unesp.
ROSS, W. D. (1949). Aristotle. Aristotle’s Prior and Posterior Analytics. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
SHIELDS, C. (2007). Aristotle. New York, Routledge.
SMITH, R. (1984). Immediate propositions and Aristotle’s proof theory. Ancient Philosophy 6, p. 47-68.
STEIN, N. (2011). Causation and Explanation in Aristotle. Philosophy Compass 6, n. 10, p. 699-670.
TAYLOR, C. C. W. (1990). Aristotle’s epistemology. In: EVERSON, S. (ed.). Epistemology. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 116-142.
WALLIES, M. (ed.) (1909). Philoponus. In Aristotelis Analytica Posteriora Commentaria. Commentaria in Aristotelem Graeca 13. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter.
WHITE, M. J. (1984). Causes as Necessary Conditions: Aristotle, Alexander of Aphrodisias and J. L. Mackie. Canadian Journal of Philosophy supplementary volume 10, p. 157-189.
ZUPPOLINI, B. (2018). Aristotle on Per Se Accidents. Ancient Philosophy 38, n. 1, p. 113-135.
How to Cite
Bastos, D. (2020). A Aristotle’s Theory of Scientific Demonstration in Posterior Analytics 1.2-9 and 1.13. Revista Archai, (30), e03021. https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_30_21