To free the soul from the body-prison: the function of true philosophy

Authors

  • Francesc Casadesús Bordoy Universitat de les Illes Balears (España)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_17_8

Keywords:

Orphism, Pythagoreanism, immortality of the soul, body, tomb, prison

Abstract

Plato portrays Socrates, in the last hours in his cell before facing death, as an expert in the hidden details of the Afterlife. He achieves this through the use of mystery terminology, of Orphic-Pythagorean origin, even presenting himself as highly knowledgeable or, even, as an initiate in this domain. However, as usual in many of his dialogues, Plato conveniently transformed this terminology into philosophical concepts. Thus, the notions of the soul’s immortality and initiation are used to define what, on diverse occasions, he calls “correct”, orthos, philosophy. In this context, Plato changed the Orphic metaphor of the body understood as the soul’s tomb, soma-sema, for the image of the body-prison. As I will attempt to show in this paper, this transformation in the metaphor owes to Plato’s interest in rectifying and “improving” the Orphic image of the tomb which, for ethical, epistemological and literary reasons, seemed insufficient to him.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BErnaBé, a. (1995). Una etimología platónica σῶμα -σῆμα. Philologus 139, pp. 204 -237.BErnaBé, a. (2011). Platón y el orfismo. Madrid, abada Editores.BoyanCé, P. (1963). note sur la phroura platoni-cienne. RPh 37, pp 7 -11BUrKErT, W. (1962). Lore and Science in Ancient Pythagoreanism. Cambridge, Mass., Harvard Univer-sity Press.CasadEsús, F. (2013). on the origin of the orphic -Pythagorean notion of the Immortality of the soul. In: CornELLI, G., MCKIraHan, r., Ma-CrIs, C. (eds.). On Pythagorism. Berlín/Boston, de Gruyter, pp. 153 -176.CasadEsús, F. (2013b). Los relatos escatológi-cos en Platón: entre el logos y el mito. Humanitas 65, p. 71 -86. CasadIo, G. (1991). La metempsicosi tra orfeo e Pitagora. In: BorGEaUd, PH. (ed.). Orphisme et Orphée, en l’honneur de Jean Rudhardt. Genève, droz, p. 119 -155.CornELLI. G. (2011). O Pitagorismo como cate‑goria historiográfica, Coimbra, são Paulo, annablume Clássica. dIETErICH, a. (1893). Ueber eine szene der aristophanischen Wolken. RhM 48, p. 275 -283.

HUFFMan, C. a. (1993). Philolaus of Croton. Pythagorean and Presocratic. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.LoraUX, n. (1995). The Experience of Tiresias: The Feminine and the Greek Man. Princeton, Prince-ton University Press.PardInI, a. (1993). L’ornitogonia (ar. Av. 693 sgg.) tra serio e faceto: Premessa letteraria al suo stu-dio storico -religioso. In: MasaraCCHIa, a. (ed.). Orfeo e l’orfismo. roma, agostino. PETErson, s. (2003). an authentically socratic Conclusion in Plato’s Phaedo: socrates’ debt to as-clepius. In: rEsHoTKo, n. (ed.). Desire, Identity, and Existence. Kelowna, BC, academic Print. & Pub., p. 33 -52.

Published

2025-11-17

How to Cite

Casadesús Bordoy, F. (2025). To free the soul from the body-prison: the function of true philosophy . Revista Archai, (17), 173. https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_17_8