From one sort of reciprocity to another: the specialization of the tasks and functions as a principle of political unity in Plato’s Republic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_16_1Keywords:
exchange, Plato, Republic, specialization of functions, tradeAbstract
Both Aristotle and Plato consider the economic exchange as one of the most basic social link. According to Ar-istotle though, the individual specialization of the tasks and functions Socrates advocates in the Republic in order to inte-grate these economic exchange into a political order, leads to the division of the city instead of unifying it. This article argues, on the contrary, that the city of the Republic owes its unity to the specialization of the tasks and functions. Far from being di-visive, this principle adds a positive political reciprocity to the ambivalent and negative reciprocity Plato sees at work at the level of the economic exchange
Downloads
References
ALVEy, J. (2011). A Short History of Ethics and Eco-nomics. Cheltenham, Edward Elgar.ANNAS, J. (1981). Introduction to Plato’s Republic. Oxford, Clarendon Press.BLOOM, A. (1968). Plato. The Republic. Trans. with notes and an interpretive essay. New york, Basic Book. BORNEMANN, E. (1923). Aristoteles’ Urteil Über Platons politische Theorie. Philologus 79, p. 70 -158, 234 -257. DESCAT, R. (2006). Le marché dans l’économie de la Grèce antique. Revue desynthèse, n°127, 2, p. 253--272.EVERS, W. M. (1980). Specialization and the Divi-sion of Labor in the Social Thought of Plato and Rous-seau. The Journal of Libertarian Studies, IV, 1, p. 45--64. FLAMENT, C. (2007). Une économie monétarisée: Athènes à l’époque classique (440 -338). Louvain – Na-mur, Peeters.FOLEy, V. (1974). The Division of Labour in Plato and Smith. History of Political Economy 6 (2), p. 220--242.GRECO, A. (2009). On the economy of specializa-tion and division of labour in Plato’s Republic. Polis 26, 1, p. 52 -72
HELMER, É. (2010). La Part du bronze. Platon et l’économie. Paris, Vrin._(2014). Les Cyniques, une économie de la frugal-ité. Revue de philosophie économique 2, v. 15, p. 3 -33.KARVONIS, P. (2007). Le vocabulaire des instal-lations commerciales en Grèce aux époques classique et hellénistique. In: ANDREAU, J.; CHANKOWSKI,V. (dir.). Vocabulaire et expression de l’économie dans le monde antique. Paris, De Boccard, p. 35 -50.LACOURSE, J. (1987). Réciprocité positive et réci-procité négative: de Marcel Mauss à René Girard. Cah-iers Internationaux de Sociologie, ns, v. 83, p. 291 -305.LEROUX, G. (2002). Platon. La République. Intro-duction, traduction et notes. Paris, Flammarion.LOVINFOSSE, J. -M. (1965). La morale de Platon. L’Antiquité classique, t. 34, fasc. 2, p. 484 -505.MAyHEW, R. (1997). Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato’s Republic. Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield.MULGAN, R. G. (1977). Aristotle’s Political The-ory: An Introduction For Students of Political Theory. Oxford, OUP.McNULTy, P. J. (1975). A Note on the Division of Labour in Plato and Smith. History of Political Econo-my v. 7 (3), p. 372 -389.PHILLIPS S IMPSON, P. L. (1998). A Philosophical Commentary on the Politics of Aristotle. Chapel Hill – London, The University of North Carolina Press.
PACHET, P. (1993). La République. Du Régime poli-tique. Traduction. Paris, Gallimard.ROSEN, S. (2005). P l at o’s Republic. A Study. New Haven & London, yale University Press.SAUVÉ ‑MEyER, S. (2002). Les dangers moraux du travail et du commerce dans les Lois de Platon. Re-vue Française d’Histoire des Idées Politiques, v. 2, n° 16, p. 387 -397.TRAN, N. (2007). Écrire l’histoire des économies antiques. La controverse entre ‘primitivisme’ et ‘mod-ernisme’ et son dépassement. IN: BRûLÉ, P.; OUL‑HEN, J.; PROST, F. (dir.). Économie et Société en Grèce antique. Rennes, Presses Universitaires de Rennes, p. 13 -28. WEINSTEIN, J. I. (2009). The Market in Plato’s Re-public.CPh v. 104, nº. 4, p. 439 -458.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Etienne Helmer

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.
1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.








