Bestiary of the aristotelian ethics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_15_2Keywords:
Aristotle, ethics, animal, bestiaryAbstract
This paper mainly aims at introducing thought about the role played by animals in the Aristotelian ethics. Most of the studies devoted to this subject explain how the animal is excluded from the morality, or bear upon the flaw named “bestiality” by Aristotle. However, such a perspective is reductive insofar as the animal appears in the Ethics otherwise as a foil. Hence, we would like to shed light on the reasons why Aristotle uses the animal in his ethics by determining its functions. The paper rests upon the Nicomachean and the Eudemian Ethics, more specifically the parts considering the particular moral virtues of courage and temperance, which are especially interested by animals. The paper is shaped into a bestiary; each note explains the introduction context of the animal, its function, and the challenges related to its presence
Downloads
References
Aristote. (1993). De l’âme. Traduction de R. Bodéüs. Paris, GF-Flammarion.
_______. (2013). Éthique à Eudème. Traduction de C. Dalimier. Paris, GF-Flammarion.
_______. (1978). Éthique à Eudème. Traduction de V. Décarie. Paris, Vrin.
_______. (2004). Éthique à Nicomaque. Traduction de R. Bodéüs, Paris, GF-Flammarion.
_______. (1994). Éthique à Nicomaque. Traduction de J. Tricot, Paris, Vrin.
_______. (1970).Éthique à Nicomaque. Traduction de R.A. Gauthier & J.Y. Jolif, Louvain, Nauwelaerts.
_______. (1993). Les politiques. Traduction de P. Pellegrin, Paris, GF-Flammarion.
_______. (1991). Métaphysique. Traduction de J. Tricot, Paris, Vrin.
_______. (2011). Parties des animaux. Traduction de F. Gain, Paris, Le Livre de Poche.
_______. (1962). Eudemische Ethik. Übersetzen von F. Dirlmeier. Berlin, Akademie-Verlag.
_______. (1967). Ethica Eudemia. Recognovit F. Susemihl. Amsterdam, Hakkert.
_______. (1903). Ethica Nicomachea. Recognovit F. Susemihl. Leipzig, Teubner. aston, E. (2011). Mixanthrôpoi. Animal-human Hybrid Deities in Greek Religion. Liège, Centre International d’Étude de la Religion Grecque Antique. bader, F. (1994). Les Sirènes et la poésie. In: Conso, D.; Fick, N; Poulle, B. (éds.). Mélanges François Kerlouégan. Paris, Les Belles Lettres, p. 17-42.bonitz, H. (1870). Index Aristotelicus. Berlin, Reimer. brandWood, L. (1976). A Word Index to Plato. Leeds, W.S. Maney.clébert, J.-P. (1971). Bestiaire fabuleux. Paris, Albin Michel. dumézil, G. (1929). Le problème des centaures. Paris, Librairie orientaliste Paul Geuthner.frère, J. (1998). Le bestiaire de Platon. Paris, Éditions Kimé. Gonzalez, F. J. (1991). Aristotle on Pleasure and Perfection, Phronesis, v. 36, n. 2, p. 141-159. Homère. (1965). Iliade. Traduction de E. Lasserre. Paris, GF-Flammarion.
_______. (2007). Odyssée. Traduction de V. Bérard. Paris, Les Belles Lettres. lefebvre, R. (2013). Aristote: zoologie et éthique, Archai, v. 11, p. 101-110.louis, P. (1967). Les animaux fabuleux chez Aristote, Revue des études grecques, p. 242-246.Platon. (1950). Œuvres complètes. Traduction de L. Robin, Paris, Gallimard. vanliefferinGe, C. (2012). Les Sirènes: du chant mortel à la musique des sphères. Lectures homériques et interprétations platoniciennes, Revue de l’histoire des religions, v. 4, p. 479-501. Wolff, F. (1997). L’animal et le dieu: deux modèles pour l’homme. Remarques pouvant servir à comprendre l’invention de l’animal. In: dHerbey, G. R. (dir.); cassin, B.;labarrière, J.-L. (éds.). L’animal dans l’Antiquité. Paris, Vrin, p. 157-180.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Louise Rodrigue

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.
1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.








