Zeno and the Impossibility of Analogy

Authors

  • Alessio Gava Doutorando em Lógica e Filosofia da Ciência - departamento de Filosofia da UFMG.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_12_3

Keywords:

Zeno of Elea, paradoxes, reductio ad absurdum, invisible, analogy

Abstract

The reductio ad absurdum has been elected by Zeno as the only method permitting to descry the true reality, invisible both to the senses and to the common way of think-ing. Showing some continuity with the previous philosophers, not only in the search for a procedure in order to speculation to advance, but also on the same route departing from what is nearer, more acquainted and particular (visible) toward what is less acquainted, more distant and universal (invisible), to say it with aristothelic words, Zeno made use of aporetic arguments as the only possible way to catch a glimpse of the ‘domain of Being’. This, in fact, is invisible not only to our senses, but also to our ordinary reasoning. Therefore, just the ‘way of not-being’, the only one that could be walked after Parmenides, as Wolff says, allows us to have an insight of what is ‘really invisible’. So invisible that it is unreachable also to though.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

CORDERO, N. L. (2007) En Parménides, ‘tertium non datur’. Anais de Filosofia Clássica, Rio de Janeiro, v. 1, n. 1, p. 1-13.PEIXOTO, M. C. D. (2012) Heráclito e Parmênides: A experiência dos sentidos entre o visível e o invisível. In: Peixoto, M.; Pimenta, M.; Puente, F. O visível e o inteligível – Estudos sobre a percepção e o pensamento na filosofia grega antiga. Belo Horizonte, Editora da UFMG.ROSSETTI, L. (2004) Empedocle scienziato. In: Rossetti, L.; Santaniello, C., Studi sul pensiero e sulla lingua di Empedocle. Bari, Levante.VASILIU, A. (1997) Du Diaphane. Paris, Vrin.YAMAKAWA, H. (2008) Visible and Invisible in Greek Philosophy. University Press of America.WOLFF, F. (1996) Dois destinos possíveis da ontologia: a via categorial e a via física. Analytica, s.l., v. 1, n. 3, p. 179-225.

Published

2025-11-29

How to Cite

Gava, A. (2025). Zeno and the Impossibility of Analogy. Revista Archai, (12), 25. https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_12_3