Innovación genérica en Lacedaimonion Politeia revisitada

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_31_10

Palavras-chave:

Jenofonte, Lacedaimonion Politeia, Esparta, género, politeia, asombro, horizonte de expectativas

Resumo

Este artículo analiza la estructura genérica y los fundamentos de la Lacedaimonion Politeia de Jenofonte. La Lac. ha sido frecuentemente considerada como un elogio o defensa de Esparta. Sin embargo, su retórica y estructura narrativa tienen poca similitud con prácticas contemporáneas para la composición de encomios o defensas. Aun cuando esto no impide un motivo elogioso o defensivo, examinar el tipo de retórica y los patrones narrativos de Jenofonte revela distintas afiliaciones genéricas, mostrando que la Lac., al igual que muchos otros escritos de Jenofonte, es un trabajo híbrido con características de la literatura de politeiai y de la investigación filosófica. En efecto, una cuidadosa pesquisa, en particular, de la manera en que Jenofonte utiliza interlocutores imaginarios (característica compartida por ambos tipos de escritura) sugiere que el encomio no puede haber sido el objetivo de este tratado.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

AZOULAY, V. (2007). Sparte et la Cyropédie. Ktema 32, p. 435-56.
BANDINI, M.; DORION, L.-A. (eds.) (2003). Xénophon. Mémorables. Tome 1. Paris, Les Belles Lettres.
BODIN, L. (ed. P. Demont) (1975). Lire le Protagoras: introduction à la méthode dialectique de Protagoras. Paris, Les Belles Lettres.
BORDES, J. (1982). Politeia dans la pensée grecque jusqu'à Aristote. Paris, Les Belles Lettres.
BRADLEY, P. J. (2001). Irony and Narrator in Xenophon's Anabasis. In: Tylawsky, E. I.; Weiss, C. G. (eds.). Essays in Honour of Gordon Williams. New Haven, p. 59-84. (Also In: Gray, V. (ed.) (2010). Oxford Readings in Classical Studies: Xenophon. Oxford, Oxford University Press, p. 520-52.)
BREITENBACH, H. R. (1966). Xenophon von Athen. Stuttgart, Alfred Druckenmüller (= RE ixa/2, p. 1569-2051).
CARTLEDGE, P. (1987). Agesilaos and the Crisis of Sparta. London, Duckworth.
CHRIMES, K.M.T. (1948). The Respublica Lacedaemoniorum ascribed to Xenophon. Manchester, Manchester University Press.
CLAY, D. (1992). Plato's first words. In: Dunn, F. M.; Cole, T. (eds.). Beginnings in Classical Literature. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 113-30.
COŞKUN, A. (2012). Pseudo-Xenophon: Ein "Alter Oligarch"? Die Athenaion politeia auf dem Prüfstand. In: Lehmann, G.-A.; Engster, D.; Nuß, A. (eds.). Von der bronzezeitlichen Geschichte zur modernen Antikenrezeption. Göttingen, Universitätsverlag, p. 55-81.
CONNOR, W. R. (1985). Historical writing in the fourth century B.C. and the Hellenistic period. In: Easterling, P.; Knox, B. M. W. (eds.). Greek Literature. Cambridge Histories Online. Cambridge University Press. DOI 10.1017/CHOL9780521210423.014, p. 458-71.
CUNIBERTI, G. (2007). Per chi scrive senofonte? Il ruolo di Lacedemoni nella produzione e ricezione delle opere di Senofonte. Ktema 32, p. 379-90.
D'ALESSANDRO, G. (ed.) (2009). Senofonte. Costituzione degli Spartani-Agesilao. Milan, Mondadori.
DAVID, E. (2007). Xénophon et le mythe de Lycurgue. Ktema 32, p. 297-310.
DIELS, H.; Kranz, W. (1952). Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker. Vol. 2. Berlin, Weidmann.
DORION, L.-A. (2003). Introduction générale. In: Bandini, M.; Dorion, L.-A. (eds.). Xénophon. Mémorables. Tome 1. Paris, Les Belles Lettres, p. vii-cclii.
DUCAT, J. (2006). Spartan Education: Youth and Society in the Classical Period. Swansea, Classical Press of Wales.
DUNN, F. M.; COLE, T. (eds.) (1992). Beginnings in Classical Literature. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
DUFF, D. (ed.) (2000). Modern Genre Theory. Harlow, Pearson Education Ltd.
ERBSE, H. (1961). Die Architektonik im Aufbau von Xenophons Memorabilien. Hermes 89.3, p. 257-87.
GENETTE, G. (1979). Introduction à l'architexte. Paris, Éditions de Seuil.
GERA, D. (1993). Xenophon's Cyropaedia: Style, Genre, and Literary Technique. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
GIGON, O. (1953). Kommentar zum ersten Buch von Xenophons Memorabilien. Basel, Friedrich Reinhardt AG.
GRAY, V. (ed.) (2007). Xenophon. On Government. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
----- (2011). Xenophon's Mirror of Princes. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
HEATH, M. (2009). Codifications of rhetoric. In: Gunderson, E. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Rhetoric. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 59-73.
HIGGINS, W. E. (1977). Xenophon the Athenian. Albany, State University of New York Press.
HUMBLE, N. (1999). Sôphrosynê and the Spartans in Xenophon. In: Powell, A.; Hodkinson, S. (eds.). Sparta: New Perspectives. Swansea, Classical Press of Wales, p. 339-53.
----- (2004). The author, date and purpose of Chapter 14 of the Lakedaimoniōn Politeia. In: Tuplin, C. (ed.). The World of Xenophon. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner, p. 215-28.
----- (2011). Xenophon's Anabasis: self and other in fourth-century Greece. In: Crowley, P.; Humble, N.; Ross, S. (eds.). Mediterranean Travels. Oxford, Legenda, p. 14-31.
----- (2020). True History: Xenophon's Agesilaos and the encomiastic genre. In: POWELL, A.; Richer, N. (eds.). Xenophon and Sparta. Swansea, Classical Press of Wales, p. 291-317.
JAUSS, H. R. (1970). Literary history as a challenge to literary theory. New Literary History 2.1, p. 7-37.
KELLY, D. (1996). Oral Xenophon. In: Worthington, I. (ed.). Voice into Text: Orality and Literacy in Ancient Greece. Leiden, Brill, p. 149-63.
KONSTAN, D. (2006). The active reader in Classical Antiquity. Argos 30, p. 5-16.
LIPKA, M. (2002). Xenophon's Spartan Constitution: Introduction, Text and Commentary. Berlin, Walter De Gruyter.
LUCCIONI, J. (1948). Les idées politiques et sociales de Xénophon. Paris, Ophrys.
MARR, J. L.; Rhodes, P. J. (eds.) (2008). The 'Old Oligarch'. The Constitution of the Athenians attributed to Xenophon. Oxford, Aris & Phillips.
MOORE, J. M. (1983). Aristotle and Xenophon on Democracy and Oligarchy. London, Chatto & Windus.
MUELLER-GOLDINGEN, C. (1995). Untersuchungen zur Xenophons Kyrupädie. Stuttgart/Leipzig, Teubner.
NICOLAI, R. (2004). Studi su Isocrate. La comunicazione letteraria nel IV sec. a.C. e i nuovi generi della prosa. Rome, Edizioni Quasar.
OLLIER, F. (ed.) (1934). Xénophon. La République des Lacédémoniens. Lyon, A. Rey.
PONTIER, P. (2006). Trouble et Ordre chez Platon et Xénophon. Paris, J. Vrin.
POWNALL, F. (2008). Critias' Commemoration of Athens. Mouseion 8.3, p. 333-54.
RHODES, P. J. (1993). A Commentary on the Aristotelian Athenaion Politeia. Oxford, Clarendon Press.
RIEDINGER, J.-C. (1991). Etude sur les Helléniques. Xénophon et l'histoire. Paris, Les Belles Lettres.
ROOD, T. (2004). Xenophon and Diodorus: continuing Thucydides. In: Tuplin, C. (ed.). The World of Xenophon. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner, p. 341-95.
ROWE, C. (2007). Plato and the Art of Philosophical Writing. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
SORDI, M. (2002). L'Athenaion Politeia e Senofonte. Aevum 76, p. 17-24.
STRAUSS, L. (1939). The spirit of Sparta or the taste of Xenophon. Social Research 6, p. 502-36.
TATUM, J. (1989). Xenophon's Imperial Fiction. On the Education of Cyrus. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
THOMAS, R. (2003). Prose performance texts: epideixis and written publication in the late fifth and early fourth centuries. In: Yunis, H. (ed.). Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 162-88.
TREU, M. (1966). Ps.-Xenophon: D. Πολιτεία Ἀθηναίων. RE ixa/2, p. 1928-82.
TUPLIN, C. (1993). The Failings of Empire: A Reading of Xenophon Hellenica 2.3.11-7.5.27. Stuttgart, Franz Steiner.
----- (1994). Xenophon, Sparta and the Cyropaedia. In: Powell, A.; Hodkinson, S. (eds.). The Shadow of Sparta. London, Routledge, p. 127-81.
----- (1996). Xenophon's Cyropaedia: education and fiction. In: Sommerstein, A. H.; Atherton, C. (eds.). Education in Greek Fiction. Bari, p. 65-162.
TYNYANOV, Y. (2000). The Literary Fact. (trans. A. Shukman). In: Duff, D. (ed.). Modern Genre Theory. Harlow, Pearson Education Ltd., p. 29-49 (first published in 1924).
USHER, S. (1990). Isocrates. Panegyricus and To Nicocles (translation, introduction and commentary). Warminster, Aris & Phillips.
YUNIS, H. (2003). Writing for reading: Thucydides, Plato, and the emergence of the critical reader. In: Yunis, H. (ed.). Written Texts and the Rise of Literate Culture in Ancient Greece. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 189-212.

Publicado

2021-06-12

Como Citar

Humble, N. (2021). Innovación genérica en Lacedaimonion Politeia revisitada. Revista Archai, (31). https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_31_10

Edição

Seção

Dossier Archai: Voces Socráticas