Bens Comuns: Uma Análise Linguística e Terminológica

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14195/2182-8830_3-1_6

Keywords:

intellectual commons, commons, language, translation.

Abstract

The expansion of practices for sharing cultural artifacts made possible by digitization and communication networks has led researchers to apply the notion of commons to the field of intellectual property – in cases such as open-source software, Wikipedia, and open-access scientific publication, for example. This article deals with linguistic and terminological issues raised by this concept and its translations (in particular, into Portuguese); examines common sources of misunderstanding, such as the conflation of the legal, economic, and theological meanings of “commons”; reviews similar words and phrases in other languages; and discusses the merits and disadvantages of the existing options in Portuguese – mainly the option for “common goods” [“bens comuns”].

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Miguel Said Vieira, Universidade de São Paulo

Doutor em Educação na Universidade de São Paulo (onde também se graduou em Comunicação / Editoração e em Filosofia), e especialista em Gestão da Propriedade Intelectual (pelo convênio SAPI / OCPI / Universidad Bolivariana de Venezuela). Seus interesses de pesquisa concentram-se nas relações entre cultura, tecnologia, colaboração, mercantilização e propriedade intelectual. Sua tese de doutorado, intitulada Os bens comuns intelectuais e a mercantilização, propôs uma leitura crítica do legado de Elinor Ostrom (laureada em 2009 com o Prêmio de Ciências Econômicas em Memória de Alfred Nobel) nas teorias de bens comuns intelectuais, e investigou as possibilidades de mercantilização subjacentes a novos modelos de negócio baseados no compartilhamento de bens culturais, em áreas como o software livre, a publicação científica em acesso aberto, o crowdfunding e a publicidade online. Milita nas áreas de cultura livre e democratização da ciência, e atua profissionalmente como editor. Suas publicações estão disponíveis em <http://impropriedades.wordpress.com>; mantém um microblog em <http://twitter.com/miguelsvieira>.

References

ALMEIDA, Alfredo Wagner Berno de, e Roberto Martins de Souza, eds. (2009). Terras de Faxinais. Manaus: Universidade do Estado do Amazo-nas. Tradição & Ordenamento Jurídico 4. http://acervo.novacartografiasocial.com.br/738738/18 .

BENKLER, Yochai (2006). The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven [Conn.]: Yale University Press. http://www.benkler.org/Benkler_Wealth_Of_Networks.pdf

BLOCH, Marc Léopold Benjamin (2008). Les Caractères Originaux de L’histoire Rurale Française. Saguenay: UQAC. http://classiques.uqac.ca/classiques/bloch_marc/histoire_rurale_fr_t1/histoire_rurale_fr_t1.html

BRAND, Ulrich (2008). “La Convergencia de Movimientos: Los Bienes Comunes En Tanto Que Cosmovisión Crítica Emancipatoria Y En Tanto Que Perspectiva Estratégica.” Genes, Bytes Y Emisiones: Bienes Comunes Y Ciudadanía. Ed. Silke Helfrich. Ediciones Böll. 302–10. http://www.boell-latinoamerica.org/downloads/Bienes_Comunes_total_EdiBoell.pdf

CAMPOS, Augusto (2009). “Morre Imre Simon.” BR-Linux.org. 14 de agosto. http://br-linux.org/wparchive/2009/morre-imre-simon.php

DE SOTO, Pablo (2014). “De Istambul a Rio de Janeiro, as Lutas Pelo Comum Nas Cidades Rebeldes.” Amanhã Vai Ser Maior: O Levante Da Multidão No Ano Que Não Terminou. São Paulo: Annablume. 143-158. https://www.academia.edu/5778287/De_Istambul_a_Rio_de_Janeiro_as_lutas_pelo_comum_nas_cidades_rebeldes

HELFRICH, Silke (2008). “Commons: Ámbitos O Bienes Comunes, Procomún O ‘Lo Nuestro’; Las Complejidades de La Traducción de Un Concepto.” Genes, Bytes Y Emisiones: Bienes Comunes Y Ciudadanía. Ed. Silke Helfrich. Ediciones Böll. 42–48. http://www.boell-latinoamerica.org/downloads/Bienes_Comunes_total_EdiBoell.pdf

HELFRICH, Silke (2010). “Bens Comuns: O Novo Conto do Século XXI.” http://www.grap.org.br/2010/01/10/bens-comuns-o-novo-conto-do-seculo-xxi/

HESS, Charlotte, e Elinor Ostrom (2003). “Ideas, Artifacts, and Facilities: Information as a Common-Pool Resource.” Law and Contemporary Prob-lems 66: 111. http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol66/iss1/5/

HESS, Charlotte, e Elinor Ostrom eds (2007). Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

IDC (2014). “Android and iOS Continue to Dominate the Worldwide Smartphone Market with Android Shipments Just Shy of 800 Million in 2013, According to IDC.” 12 de fevereiro. http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/02/12/ma-idc-idUSnBw125399a+100+BSW20140212

LAFUENTE, Antonio (2007). El Carnaval de La Tecnociencia. Madrid: Gadir.

LINEBAUGH, Peter (2008). The Magna Carta Manifesto: Liberties and Commons for All. Berkeley: University of California Press.

LIPIETZ, Alain (2010). “Questions Sur Les ‘Biens Communs’ [Intervention Au Débat de La Fondation Heinrich Böll, FSM de Belém].” http://lipietz.net/spip.php?article2344

META CONTRIBUTORS (2014). “List of Wikipedias.” 20 de julho. http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias

NETCRAFT (2014). “June 2014 Web Server Survey.” 6 de junho. http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2014/06/06/june-2014-web-server-survey.html

OSTROM, Elinor (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. The Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions.

OSTROM, Vincent, e Elinor Ostrom (1977). “Public Goods and Public Choices.” Alternatives for Delivering Public Services: Toward Improved Perfor-mance. Ed. E. S. Savas. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. http://johannes.lecture.ub.ac.id/files/2012/02/Public-Goods-and-Public-Choices.pdf

PHIPPS, Simon (2010). “The Case for ‘rossio.’” Wild Webmink. 25 de novembro. http://webmink.com/2010/11/25/the-case-for-rossio/

PILATI, José Isaac (2009). “Conceito e Classificação da Propriedade na Pós-modernidade: A Era das Propriedades Especiais.” Seqüência: Estudos Jurí-dicos e Políticos 30.59: 89–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2177-7055.2009v30n59p89

ROSE, C. M. (2003). “Romans, Roads, and Romantic Creators: Traditions of Public Property in the Information Age.” Law and Contemporary Problems 66.1-2: 89–111. http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/lcp/vol66/iss1/4/

SAVOIRSCOM1 (2013). “(Biens) Communs : Contours et Repères.” Savoi-rsCom1. 6 de maio. http://www.savoirscom1.info/2013/05/bien-communs-contours-et-reperes/

SIMON, Imre, e Miguel Said Vieira (2008). “O Rossio Não-Rival.” Além Das Redes de Colaboração. Salvador: EDUFBA. 15-30. http://books.scielo.org/id/22qtc

TAVARES, Luis Almeida (2008). “Campesinato e os faxinais do Paraná: as terras de uso comum.” Tese de doutorado. Universidade de São Paulo. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/8/8136/tde-04052009-164145/

VIEIRA, Miguel Said (2009). “Relato Do Encontro ‘O Futuro Dos Bens Comuns.’”. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2574934

VIEIRA, Miguel Said (2014). “Os Bens Comuns Intelectuais e a Mercantilização.” Tese de doutorado. Faculdade de Educação da Universidade de São Paulo. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/48/48134/tde-01102014-104738/

WIKIPEDIA CONTRIBUTORS (2014). “Encyclopædia Britannica.” Wikipedia. 24 de julho. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Encyclop%C3%A6dia_Britannica&oldid=618308251

MatLit_3.1 (cover)

Downloads

Published

2015-10-28

How to Cite

Vieira, Miguel Said. 2015. “Bens Comuns: Uma Análise Linguística E Terminológica”. MATLIT: Materialities of Literature 3 (1):99-110. https://doi.org/10.14195/2182-8830_3-1_6.

Issue

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2015): Arts, Media and Digital Culture

Section

Secção Temática | Thematic Section

License

MATLIT embraces full open access to all issues. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
  4. A CC licensing information in a machine-readable format is embedded in all articles published by MATLIT.
  1. Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

  1. You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
  2. No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.