A Literatura Electrónica Não Existe (Mas Está em Todo o Lado)





literatura digital, teoria dos média


Recensão crítica de Sandy Baldwin, The Internet Unconscious: On the Subject of Electronic Literature. Bloomsbury Academic, 2015, 187 pp. ISBN 978-1-62892-338-4

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14195/2182-8830_4-1_13


Não há dados estatísticos.


BALDWIN, Sandy (2015). The Internet Unconscious: On the Subject of Electronic Literature. London.

CAYLEY, John (2013). “Pentameters Toward the Dissolution of Certain Vectoral¬ist Relations.” Amodern 2. 10 Nov. 2015. http://amodern.net/article/pentameters-toward-the-dissolution-of-certain-vectoralist-relations.

CAYLEY, John (2013). “Terms of Reference & Vectoralist Transgressions: Situ-ating Certain Literary Transactions over Networked Services.” Amodern 2. 10 Nov. 2015. http://amodern.net/article/terms-of-reference-vectoralist-transgressions.

CAYLEY, John & Daniel C. Howe (2012). How It Is in Common Tongues. Cited from the Com¬mons of digitally inscribed writing by John Cayley & Daniel C. Howe, NLLF [Natural Language Liberation Front].

GALLOWAY, Alexander R. (2004). Protocol: How Control Exists after Decentraliza¬tion. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

PASQUINELLI, Matteo (2009). “Google’s PageRank Algorithm: A Diagram of Cognitive Capitalism and the Rentier of the Common Intellect.” Deep Search: The Politics of Search Beyond Google. Eds. Konrad Becker, Felix Stalder. London: Transaction Publishers. 152-162.

PASQUINELLI, Matteo (2010). “The Ideology of Free Culture and the Grammar of Sabotage.” Education in the Creative Economy: Knowledge and Learning in the Age of Innovation. Eds. D. Araya amd M.A. New York: Peter Lang. 285-304.

TERRANOVA, Tiziana (2000). “Free Labor: Producing Culture for the Digi-tal Economy.” Social Text 63 18.2: 33-58.

TIQQUN (2001). “L’hypothèse cybernétique.” Tiqqun 2: 40-83.

Sandy Baldwin_The Internet Unconscious (cover)




Como Citar

Marques da Silva, Ana. 2016. «A Literatura Electrónica Não Existe (Mas Está Em Todo O Lado)». MATLIT: Materialidades Da Literatura 4 (1):191-96. https://doi.org/10.14195/2182-8830_4-1_13.



Recensões | Reviews