A Chance for Cinema-Writing in Electronic Literature

  • Will Luers Washington State University Vancouver


Computational cinema, the digital manipulation of pixels, frames, shots and sequences, is a catch-all term for the many ways digital technology can affect cinema as a system of expression. If a movie scene calls for a snowstorm, CGI can be employed to create an idealized snowstorm. Computation in this sense is used to efficiently control contingencies (weather) and direct the intentions of “the writing” or preconceived idea. But computation can also create new contingencies that add to the camera’s already complex presentation of the world. Multimedia hypertext and interactive cinema, generative and recombinant video, datamoshing and databending all introduce forms of indeterminacy into digital cinema. As digital writing becomes even more cinematic and immersive, it is important to revisit the roots of cinema art and seek its relation both to writing and the world. The ideal of “cinema-writing,” or cinécriture in the French cinema context, is one that takes the machine seriously as a tool to bring the world into thought and thought out onto the world. Cinema and writing together, as imagined by the art’s earliest practitioners and theorists, is a way to harness the camera’s unique indexicality; to extend its spatio-temporal reach and direct its signification towards narrative, but also to benefit from its dispersed realism, its opacity and its potential to escape thought and narrative closure altogether. In this paper, I explore affiliations between cinema art and electronic literature, with a particular focus on computation as an extension of cinema-writing. Through examples of cinematic electronic literature, as well as film and video art, I will present strategies for a computational cinema that welcomes chance operations into the process of signification; that seeks an “outside” within (and beside) narrative composition and authorial intent.


electronic literature, digital writing, digital cinema, computation, machine-writing

  • Abstract viewed = 104 times
  • PDF viewed = 65 times
  • HTML viewed = 110 times


Download data is not yet available.


AMERIKA, Mark (2009). “Immobilité.” 28 June 2017. http://www.immobilite.com/.

BAZIN, André, and Hugh Gray (2005). What Is Cinema? Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

BÉNEZÉT, Delphine (2014). The Cinema of Agnes Varda. London: Wallflower P.

BOUCHARDON, Serge (2017). “Towards a Tension-Based Definition of Digital Literature.” Journal of Creative Writing Studies 2.1, Article 6: 1-13.

CONLEY, Tom (1991). Film Hieroglyphs: Ruptures in Classical Cinema. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

DEBORD, Guy (1956). “Theory of the Dérive.” 28 June 2017. http://www.cddc.vt.edu/sionline/si/theory.html.

DELEUZE, Gilles (1995). Cinema. Mineapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

DOANE, Mary Ann (2002). The Emergence of Cinematic Time: Modernity, Contingency, the Archive. Cam-bridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

DUARTE, German A (2014). Fractal Narrative about the Relationship between Geometries and Technology and Its Impact on Narrative Spaces. Bielefeld: Transcript.

EPSTEIN, Jean, and Christophe Wall-Romana (2015). The Intelligence of a Machine. Minneapolis: Universi-ty of Minnesota Press.

GODARD, Jean-Luc (2011). Histoire(s) Du Cinema. Olive Films.

GORMAN, Samantha, and Danny Cannizzaro (2017). PRY on the App Store. 30 June 2017. https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/pry/id846195114?mt=8.

HEATH, Stephen (1981). Questions of Cinema. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

KIM, Jihoon (2016). Between Film, Video, and the Digital: Hybrid Moving Images in the Post-media Age. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

LIALINA, Olia (1996). “War.” 28 June 2017. http://www.teleportacia.org/war/.

MANOVICH, Lev (2001). The Language of New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

MEANEY, Evan (2015). “The_Ceibas_Cycle.” 28 June 2017. http://www.evanmeaney.com/cycle/.

MICHELSON, Annette, and Kevin O’Brien (1985). Kino-eye: The Writings of Dziga Vertov. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

MILES, Adrian (2008). “Softvideography: Digital Video as Postliterate Practice.” Small Tech: The Culture of Digital Tools. Eds. Byron Hawk, David M. Rieder, and Ollie Oviedo. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. 10-22.

MORIN, Edgar (2005). The Cinema, Or, The Imaginary Man. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

RANCIÈRE, Jacques (2016). Film Fables. London, UK: Bloomsbury Academic.

RENSEIW, Sam (2017). “Spacetwo : Patalab.” 28 June 2017. https://patalab02.blogspot.com/

RODOWICK, David Norman (2001). Reading the Figural, Or, Philosophy after the New Media. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

RODOWICK, David Norman (2007). The Virtual Life of Film. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

RODOWICK, David Norman (2010). Afterimages of Gilles Deleuze’s Film Philosophy. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

WALL-ROMANA, Christophe (2012). Cinepoetry: Imaginary Cinemas in French Poetry. Fordham University Press.

WALL-ROMANA, Christophe (2013). Jean Epstein. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

WITT, Michael (2013). Jean-Luc Godard, Cinema Historian. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
How to Cite
LUERS, Will. A Chance for Cinema-Writing in Electronic Literature. MATLIT: Materialities of Literature, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 2, p. 37-51, aug. 2018. ISSN 2182-8830. Available at: <https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/matlit/article/view/5216>. Date accessed: 24 aug. 2019.
Secção Temática | Thematic Section