A ciência da avaliação do risco: “evidenciação” de limites epistemológicos inevitáveis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-7723_28-2_10Palavras-chave:
Risco, avaliação de risco, epistemologia, incerteza, éticaResumo
O autor apresenta uma análise da estrutura epistemológica associada à avaliação do risco considerada como componente fundamental da gestão do risco, em sentido lato. Após a justificação da seleção desta componente das outras que constituem a gestão do risco (sentido restrito) e de crises, apresentam-se algumas características do risco e da respectiva avaliação que evidenciam desafios e limites epistemológicos específicos e inevitáveis. A “evidenciação” destes limites e dos efeitos na ética e na comunicação do risco é uma manifestação positiva da maturidade e da consolidação desta área do conhecimento e um incentivo a desenvolvimentos futuros.
Downloads
Referências
Almeida, A. (2011a). Incertezas e Riscos. Conceptualização Operacional, Esfera do Caos, 237p.
Almeida, A. (2011b). Risco e gestão do risco: questões filosóficas subjacentes ao modelo técnico conceptual, Territorium 18, Associação Portuguesa de Riscos, Prevenção e Segurança, 23-31. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14195/1647-7723_18_2
Almeida, A. (2014). Gestão do risco e da incerteza: conceitos e filosofia subjacente. Realidades e Desafios na Gestão dos Riscos, Diálogo entre Ciência e Utilizadores, Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra, 19-29. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14195/978-972-8330-23-1_2
Apostolakis, G. (2003). How Useful is Quantitative Risk Assessment?, M.I.T., Engineering System Division, Working Papers Series (ESD-WP-2003-05), 17 p.
Aven,T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: review of recent advances on their foundation, European Journal of Operational Research, 253, Elsevier, 1-13.
Aven, T. (2019). The cautionary principle in risk management: Foundation and practical use, Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 191, 6 p.
Aven, T. (2020). Three influential risk foundation papers from the 80s and 90s: Are they still state-of-the-art? Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 193, 8 p.
Aven, T., Renn, O. e Rosa, E. A. (2011). On the ontological status of the concept of risk. Safety Science, 49 (8-9), 1074-1079. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2011.04.015
Aziz, S. e Dowling, M. (2018). AI and machine learning for risk management, SRN Electronic Journal, January, 18 p., URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3201337
Bernstein, P. L. (1998). Against the Gods. The Remarkable Story of Risk, J. Wiley, New York, 383 p.
Brannmark, J. e Sahlin, N. (2010). Ethical Theory and the Philosophy of Risk: First Thought, Journal of Risk Research, 13, 149-161.
Brito, M. (2012). Direito Administrativo, Perigo, Risco e Princípio Democrático. Direitos das Catástrofes Naturais, Carla Amado Gomes (ed.), Capítulo VII, Almedina, 323-354.
Brown, H. e Goble, R. (1990). The Role of Scientists in Risk Assessment. RISK: Issues in Health and Safety, Vol. 1, n.º 4, 283-311.
Coolen, F. P. A., Troffaes, M. C. M. e Augustin, T. (2010). Imprecise Probability, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science, Springer, 5 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_296
Dutant, J. e Engel, P., eds, (2017). Philosophie de la Connaissance, Croyance, Connaissance, Justification, VRIN, Textes clés de philosophie de la connaissance, 448 p.
Eldevik, S., Hafver, A., Jakopanec, I. e Pedersen, F. B. (2017). Risk, Uncertainty, and “What if” - a practical view on uncertainty and risk in the knowledge - and physical domain, ESREL Conference Paper. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315210469-149
Fischhoff, B. (2015). The Realities of risk-cost-benefit analysis, Science 350 (6260), 8 p.
Flage, R. e Aven, T. (2015). Emerging risk – Conceptual definition and a relation to black swan type of events. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 144, 61-67.
Goerlandt, F., Khakzad, N. e Reniers, G. (2017). Validity and Validation of Safety-Related Quantitative Risk Analysis. Safety Science, 99, Part B, Elsevier, 127-139.
Hansson, S. (2004). Philosophical Perspectives on Risk, Techné 8:1,10-35.
Hansson, S. (2005). Seven Mythes of Risk. Risk Management: An International Journal, 7 (2), 7-17.
ISO - International Organization for Standardization (2009). Risk Management - Principles and Guidelines, ISO/TC 262 Risk Management, 24 p.
Kaplan, S. e Garrick, B. (1981). On The Quantitative Definition of Risk, Risk Analysis, Vol.1, n.º 1, p 11-27.
Knight, F. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty and Profit, Boston, Cambridge, Houghton Mifflin, 387 p.
Lane, D. e Maxfield, R. (2004). Ontological Uncertainty and Innovation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, January, 48 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-004-0227-7
Leher, K. (1986). The coherence theory of knowledge, Philosophical Topics, 14, 5-25 (e em Dutant e Engel (2017), 111-141).
Lourenço, L. e Almeida, A. (2018). Alguns Conceitos à Luz da Teoria do Risco, Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra. Riscos e Crises. Da teoria à plena manifestação, Série “Riscos e Catástrofes”, Vol. 6, 18-77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14195/978-989-26-1697-1_1
Ludwig, C. (2019). Para uma concepção epistemológica da incerteza. Revista da Faculdade de Direito UFPR, Curitiba, Brasil, Vol. 64, n.º 1, 97-117. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5380/rfdufpr.v64i1.62405
McCarthy, D. (1997). Rights, Explanation, and Risks, Ethics, The University of Chicago Press, Vol. 107, n.º 2, 205-225.
Njå, O., Solberg, Ø. e Braut, G. S. ( (2017). Uncertainty - Its Ontological Status and Relation to Safety, “The Illusion of Control” (cap. 2), Safety Management, G. Motet e c. Bieder (eds.), 5-21.
NRC - NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL (1983). Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process, Ruckelshaus, Risk, Science and Democracy, Vol I, Issues in Science and Technology, 19 (1985).
Paltrinieri, N., Comfort, L. e Reniers, G. (2019). Learning about risk: machine learning for risk assessment. Safety Science,118, 475-486.
Popper, K. (1992). Un Univers de Propensions. Deux études sur la causalité et l´évolution. Editions de L´Éclat, Collection tiré à part (Sciences Humaines et Sociales), 80 p.
Rice, C. e Dunbar,W. (2016). A framework for adaptive risk management in the planning, design, and construction of mining projects, Proceedings of Risk and Resilience Mining Solutions Conference, Vancouver, Canada, InfoMine, 213-230, ISBN: 978-1-988185-00-2.
Sackris, D. e Beebe, J. (2013). Is Justification Necessary for Knowledge?, Advances in Experimental Epistemology, 175-192.
Seiler, F. e Alvarez, J. (1994). The Scientific Method in Risk Assessment. Technology: Journal of The Franklin Institute, Vol. 331 A, 53-58.
Shrader-Frechette, K. (1991). Risk and Rationality: Philosophical Foundations for Populists Reforms, Los Angeles, University of California, 84 p.
SRA (2015). Society for Risk Analysis Glossary, 9 p., URL: https://www.sra.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/SRA-Glossary-FINAL.pdf
Slovic, P. (2000). The Perception of Risk, London, Earthscan, 473 p.
Tannert, C., Elvers, H. D. e Jandrig, B. (2007). The ethics of uncertainty. In the light of possible dangers, research becomes a moral duty, EMBO reports, Vol.8, n.º 10, 892-896.
Turner, S. (2003). Liberal Democracy 3.0 Civil Society in an Age of Experts, Sage Publications, 154 p.
USNRC - UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (1975). WASH-1400 – Reactor Safety Study, NUREG-75/014 (Rasmussen Report), Washington, USA, 198 p.
USNRC - UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (1978). Risk Assessment Review Group Report to the U.S. Nuclear Regularity Commssion, USNRC Ad-hoc Review Group, NUREG/CR-0400, Washington, USA, 66 p.
Vasconcelos, V. D., Soares, W. A. e Costa, A. C. L. D. (2015). FN-CURVES: preliminar estimation of severe accident risks after Fukushima, 2015 International Nuclear Atlantic Conference - INAC 2015 São Paulo, SP, Brazil, October 4-9, 2015 Associação Brasileira de Energia Nuclear - ABEN (ISBN: 978-85-99141-06-9).
Walley, P. (2000). Towards a unified theory of imprecise probability. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 24, 125-148.
Wenning, C. (2009). Scientific epistemology: How scientists know what they know, J. Phys. Tchr. Educ. Online, 5(2), Illinois State University Physics Dept., 3-15.
Welch, J. (2017). Coping with Ethical Uncertainty. Diametros, A Journal of Philosophy, 53 (2017), 150–166. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.13153/diam.53.0.1105
##submission.downloads##
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2021 Territorium
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0.
Os autores conservam os direitos de autor e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite a partilha do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
