Portabilidade, Evanescências e Rubricas: Discussões em torno da Literatura Digital na Sala de Aula
Abstract
This paper addresses three issues affecting the attempt to teach digital literary texts in the classroom by observing their implications for pedagogical practice in the preparation of future teachers. The integrity of the digital object and its reception, which I call portability, is discussed through the modes of engagement with the text and its unlikely or difficult reproducibility as an aesthetic experience in the classroom. In the case of evanescence, both the access to the aesthetic experience and the study as criticism become problematic due to obstacles like geo-referencing, copyright issues, object transience, and obsolescence of software and hardware. Finally, the guidelines for the reading experience not only organize but also impose a priori limits to the perception of the literary object.
- Abstract viewed = 332 times
- HTML (Português (Portugal)) viewed = 57 times
- PDF (Português (Portugal)) viewed = 55 times
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
ATTIAH, Karen (2015). “How Western media would cover Baltimore if it happened elsewhere.” Washington Post 30 abr.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2015/04/30/how-western-media-would-cover-baltimore-if-it-happened-elsewhere/?postshare=401430447574070.
BAGGI, Cristiane Aparecida dos Santos, Doraci Alves Lopes (2011). “Evasão e avaliação institucional no ensino superior: uma discussão bibliográfica.” Avaliação 16.2 (jul.): 355-374.
http://www.scielo.br/pdf/aval/v16n2/a07v16n2.
BAKHTIN, Mikhail (2002). Questões de Literatura e Estética. São Paulo: Hucitec.
BENNETT, Sue, Karl Maton, Lisa Kervin (2008). “The ‘digital natives’ debate: a critical review of evidence.” British Journal of Educational Technology 39.5: 775-786. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x.
BOLTER, Jay David (2007). “Digital Media and Art: Always Already Complicit?” Criticism 49.1 (winter): 107-118.
http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/criticism/ vol49/iss1/5.
BOLTER, Jay David, Richard Grusin (1999). Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press.
CAMPOS, Augusto (2003). Não: Poemas. São Paulo: Perspectiva.
COLLINS, Jim (2010). Bring on the Books for Everybody: How Literary Culture Became Popular Culture. Durham: Duke University Press.
CORRÊA, Alamir Aquino (2012). “Is Jorge Amado the gateway to Brazil or not?” Comparative Literature Studies 49.3: 361-371.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/complitstudies.49.3.0361.
CORRÊA, Alamir Aquino (2014). “Aspectos Antitéticos entre Apeirokalia e Liberdade Criadora na Arte Digital.” Criação Digital: Prática e Reflexão. Eds. Cláudia G. Vilarouca, Otávio G. Tavares e Cláudio A. C. Moura. Florianópolis: Copiart. 46-58.
CORRÊA, Alamir Aquino (2016). “Tecnología y la poesía en Brasil: lo visual, lo sonoro y el nuevo ‘bello’ posible.” Poesía y Poéticas digitales / Electrónicas / Tecnos / New-media en América Latina: Definiciones y Exploraciones. Eds. Luis Correa-Díaz e Scott Weintraub. Bogotá: Universidad Central. 637-664. http://www.ucentral.edu.co/editorial/catalogo/poesia-poeticas-digitales.
EARHART, Amy E. (2012). “Can Information Be Unfettered? Race and the New Digital Humanities Canon.” Debates in the Digital Humanities. Ed. Matthew K. Gold. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 309-318.
FUNKHOUSER, Christopher (2007). Prehistoric Digital Poetry an Archaeology of Forms. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
FUNKHOUSER, Christopher (2008). “Digital Poetry: A Look at Generative, Visual, and Interconnected Possibilities in its First Four Decades.” A Companion to Digital Literary Studies. Eds. Susan Schreibman e Ray Siemens. Oxford: Blackwell. http://www.digitalhumanities.org/companionDLS/.
FUNKHOUSER, Christopher (2012). New Directions in Digital Poetry. New York: Continuum.
GARCÍA CANCLINI, Néstor (1989). Culturas Híbridas: Estrategias para Entrar y Salir de la Modernidad. México: Grijalbo.
GARCÍA CANCLINI, Néstor (2004). Diferentes, Desiguales y Desconectados. Barcelona: Gedisa.
GIAMPÁ, Daniele (2010). Testo e Tessuto. Parla come Navighi. Antologia della Webletteratura Italiana. Ed. Mario Gerosa. Piombino: Associazone Culturale Il Foglio. http://elmcip.net/node/10384.
HARTLING, Florian (2005). “The Canonization of German-language Digital Literature.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 7.4
http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.1281.
HAYLES, N. Katherine (2008). Electronic Literature: New Horizons for the Literary. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
JONES, Christopher, Binhui Shao (2011). The Net Generation and Digital Natives: Implications for Higher Education. York: Higher Education Academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/node/4011.
JUVAN, Marco (2000). “On Literariness: From Post-Structuralism to Systems Theory.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 2.2.
http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb/vol2/iss2/.
KIRCHOF, Edgar R. (2013). “Desafios para o ensino da literatura digital.” Revista da ANPOLL 35: 127-142.
http://www.anpoll.org.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/647/716.
KIRSCHENBAUM, Matthew G. (2008). Mechanisms: New Media and the Forensic Imagination. Cambridge: MIT.
KNEWTON. Flipped classroom. http://www.knewton.com/flipped-classroom/.
LANDOW, George P. (2006). Hypertext 3.0: Critical Theory and New Media in an Era of Globalization. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
LAVAGNINO, John (2008). “Digital and Analog Texts. A Companion to Digital Literary Studies.” Eds. Susan Schreibman e Ray Siemens. Oxford: Blackwell. http://www.digitalhumanities.org/companionDLS/.
PAYNE, Susan E. (2013). “Teaching Today's “Digital Native” College Student.” North American Professors of Christian Education Conference: papers. http://www.napce.org/documents/!pdfs/papers-2013/payne.pdf.
PRENSKY, Marc (2001). “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1.” On the Horizon 9.5: 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1108/10748120110424816.
PRENSKY, Marc (2010). Teaching Digital Natives: Partnering for Real Learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
PRESSMAN, Jessica (2014). Digital Modernism: Making it New in New Media. New York: Oxford U P.
PRESSMAN, Jessica, and Lisa Swanstrom (2013). “The Literary And/As the Digital Humanities.” Digital Humanities Quaterly 7.1.
http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/7/1/000154/000154.html.
PRICE, Kenneth M., Ray Siemens (2014). “Introduction.” Literary Studies in the Digital Age: An Evolving Anthology.
https://dlsanthology.commons.mla.org/introduction/.
RETTBERG, Scott (2013). “An Emerging Canon? A Preliminary Analysis of All References to Creative Works in Critical Writing Documented in the ELMCIP Electronic Literature Knowledge Base.” Elmcip.
http://elmcip.net/criticalwriting/emerging-canon-preliminary-analysis-all-references-creative-works-critical-writing.
RONSON, Jon (2015). “How One Stupid Tweet Blew Up Justine Sacco’s Life.” The New York Times Magazine 12 fev.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/15/magazine/how-one-stupid-tweet-ruined-justine-saccos-life.html?_r=0.
SANTOS, Alckmar Luiz dos (2003). Leituras de Nós: Ciberespaço e Literatura. São Paulo: Itaú Cultural.
SANZ, Amelia (2013). “Digital Humanities or Hypercolonial Studies.” http://responsible-innovation.org.uk/torrii/sites/default/files/Final%20_sanz_hypercolonial_sent3.pdf.
SCHOLES, Robert (1985). Textual Power: Literary Theory and the Teaching of English. New Haven: Yale University Press.
SIMANOWSKI, Roberto, Jörgen Schäffer, Peter Gendolla (2010). Reading Moving Letters: Digital Literature in Research and Teaching. New Brunswick: Transcript.
SMITH, Erika (2013). “Are Adult Educators and Learners ‘Digital Immigrants’? Examining the Evidence and Impacts for Continuing Education.” Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education 39.1 (spring): 1-13. https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/cjuce-rcepu/article/viewFile/20722/15827.
STOKES, Suzanne (2001). “Visual Literacy in Teaching and Learning: A Literature Perspective.” Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education 1.1. http://ejite.isu.edu/Volume1No1/Stokes.html.
TWEEDIE, Eddie (2015). “Google’s New Classroom App Lets Kids Turn In Homework With Their Phones.” Business Insider.
http://www.businessinsider.com/google-classroom-app-lets-kids-turn-in-homework-with-their-phones-2015-1.
UNESCO. Institute for Information Technologies in Education (2011). Policy Brief – Digital Natives: How do They Learn? How to Teach Them? http://iite.unesco.org/pics/publications/en/files/3214698.pdf.
WOODALL, Stephen (2014). “Radical Publishing: The Organization and Distribution of Art, Literature and Information in the 21st Century.” Eds. Dennis Reidsma, Insook Choi e Robin Bargar. Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment. Cham: Springer. 123-127.
YOO, Hyun-Joo (2007). Text, Hypertext, Hypermedia. Ästhetische Möglichkeiten der digitalen Literatur mittels Intertextualität, Interaktivität und Intermedialität. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2015/04/30/how-western-media-would-cover-baltimore-if-it-happened-elsewhere/?postshare=401430447574070.
BAGGI, Cristiane Aparecida dos Santos, Doraci Alves Lopes (2011). “Evasão e avaliação institucional no ensino superior: uma discussão bibliográfica.” Avaliação 16.2 (jul.): 355-374.
http://www.scielo.br/pdf/aval/v16n2/a07v16n2.
BAKHTIN, Mikhail (2002). Questões de Literatura e Estética. São Paulo: Hucitec.
BENNETT, Sue, Karl Maton, Lisa Kervin (2008). “The ‘digital natives’ debate: a critical review of evidence.” British Journal of Educational Technology 39.5: 775-786. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00793.x.
BOLTER, Jay David (2007). “Digital Media and Art: Always Already Complicit?” Criticism 49.1 (winter): 107-118.
http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/criticism/ vol49/iss1/5.
BOLTER, Jay David, Richard Grusin (1999). Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press.
CAMPOS, Augusto (2003). Não: Poemas. São Paulo: Perspectiva.
COLLINS, Jim (2010). Bring on the Books for Everybody: How Literary Culture Became Popular Culture. Durham: Duke University Press.
CORRÊA, Alamir Aquino (2012). “Is Jorge Amado the gateway to Brazil or not?” Comparative Literature Studies 49.3: 361-371.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5325/complitstudies.49.3.0361.
CORRÊA, Alamir Aquino (2014). “Aspectos Antitéticos entre Apeirokalia e Liberdade Criadora na Arte Digital.” Criação Digital: Prática e Reflexão. Eds. Cláudia G. Vilarouca, Otávio G. Tavares e Cláudio A. C. Moura. Florianópolis: Copiart. 46-58.
CORRÊA, Alamir Aquino (2016). “Tecnología y la poesía en Brasil: lo visual, lo sonoro y el nuevo ‘bello’ posible.” Poesía y Poéticas digitales / Electrónicas / Tecnos / New-media en América Latina: Definiciones y Exploraciones. Eds. Luis Correa-Díaz e Scott Weintraub. Bogotá: Universidad Central. 637-664. http://www.ucentral.edu.co/editorial/catalogo/poesia-poeticas-digitales.
EARHART, Amy E. (2012). “Can Information Be Unfettered? Race and the New Digital Humanities Canon.” Debates in the Digital Humanities. Ed. Matthew K. Gold. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 309-318.
FUNKHOUSER, Christopher (2007). Prehistoric Digital Poetry an Archaeology of Forms. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
FUNKHOUSER, Christopher (2008). “Digital Poetry: A Look at Generative, Visual, and Interconnected Possibilities in its First Four Decades.” A Companion to Digital Literary Studies. Eds. Susan Schreibman e Ray Siemens. Oxford: Blackwell. http://www.digitalhumanities.org/companionDLS/.
FUNKHOUSER, Christopher (2012). New Directions in Digital Poetry. New York: Continuum.
GARCÍA CANCLINI, Néstor (1989). Culturas Híbridas: Estrategias para Entrar y Salir de la Modernidad. México: Grijalbo.
GARCÍA CANCLINI, Néstor (2004). Diferentes, Desiguales y Desconectados. Barcelona: Gedisa.
GIAMPÁ, Daniele (2010). Testo e Tessuto. Parla come Navighi. Antologia della Webletteratura Italiana. Ed. Mario Gerosa. Piombino: Associazone Culturale Il Foglio. http://elmcip.net/node/10384.
HARTLING, Florian (2005). “The Canonization of German-language Digital Literature.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 7.4
http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.1281.
HAYLES, N. Katherine (2008). Electronic Literature: New Horizons for the Literary. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
JONES, Christopher, Binhui Shao (2011). The Net Generation and Digital Natives: Implications for Higher Education. York: Higher Education Academy. https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/node/4011.
JUVAN, Marco (2000). “On Literariness: From Post-Structuralism to Systems Theory.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 2.2.
http://docs.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb/vol2/iss2/.
KIRCHOF, Edgar R. (2013). “Desafios para o ensino da literatura digital.” Revista da ANPOLL 35: 127-142.
http://www.anpoll.org.br/revista/index.php/revista/article/view/647/716.
KIRSCHENBAUM, Matthew G. (2008). Mechanisms: New Media and the Forensic Imagination. Cambridge: MIT.
KNEWTON. Flipped classroom. http://www.knewton.com/flipped-classroom/.
LANDOW, George P. (2006). Hypertext 3.0: Critical Theory and New Media in an Era of Globalization. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
LAVAGNINO, John (2008). “Digital and Analog Texts. A Companion to Digital Literary Studies.” Eds. Susan Schreibman e Ray Siemens. Oxford: Blackwell. http://www.digitalhumanities.org/companionDLS/.
PAYNE, Susan E. (2013). “Teaching Today's “Digital Native” College Student.” North American Professors of Christian Education Conference: papers. http://www.napce.org/documents/!pdfs/papers-2013/payne.pdf.
PRENSKY, Marc (2001). “Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1.” On the Horizon 9.5: 1-6. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1108/10748120110424816.
PRENSKY, Marc (2010). Teaching Digital Natives: Partnering for Real Learning. Thousand Oaks: Corwin.
PRESSMAN, Jessica (2014). Digital Modernism: Making it New in New Media. New York: Oxford U P.
PRESSMAN, Jessica, and Lisa Swanstrom (2013). “The Literary And/As the Digital Humanities.” Digital Humanities Quaterly 7.1.
http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/7/1/000154/000154.html.
PRICE, Kenneth M., Ray Siemens (2014). “Introduction.” Literary Studies in the Digital Age: An Evolving Anthology.
https://dlsanthology.commons.mla.org/introduction/.
RETTBERG, Scott (2013). “An Emerging Canon? A Preliminary Analysis of All References to Creative Works in Critical Writing Documented in the ELMCIP Electronic Literature Knowledge Base.” Elmcip.
http://elmcip.net/criticalwriting/emerging-canon-preliminary-analysis-all-references-creative-works-critical-writing.
RONSON, Jon (2015). “How One Stupid Tweet Blew Up Justine Sacco’s Life.” The New York Times Magazine 12 fev.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/15/magazine/how-one-stupid-tweet-ruined-justine-saccos-life.html?_r=0.
SANTOS, Alckmar Luiz dos (2003). Leituras de Nós: Ciberespaço e Literatura. São Paulo: Itaú Cultural.
SANZ, Amelia (2013). “Digital Humanities or Hypercolonial Studies.” http://responsible-innovation.org.uk/torrii/sites/default/files/Final%20_sanz_hypercolonial_sent3.pdf.
SCHOLES, Robert (1985). Textual Power: Literary Theory and the Teaching of English. New Haven: Yale University Press.
SIMANOWSKI, Roberto, Jörgen Schäffer, Peter Gendolla (2010). Reading Moving Letters: Digital Literature in Research and Teaching. New Brunswick: Transcript.
SMITH, Erika (2013). “Are Adult Educators and Learners ‘Digital Immigrants’? Examining the Evidence and Impacts for Continuing Education.” Canadian Journal of University Continuing Education 39.1 (spring): 1-13. https://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/cjuce-rcepu/article/viewFile/20722/15827.
STOKES, Suzanne (2001). “Visual Literacy in Teaching and Learning: A Literature Perspective.” Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education 1.1. http://ejite.isu.edu/Volume1No1/Stokes.html.
TWEEDIE, Eddie (2015). “Google’s New Classroom App Lets Kids Turn In Homework With Their Phones.” Business Insider.
http://www.businessinsider.com/google-classroom-app-lets-kids-turn-in-homework-with-their-phones-2015-1.
UNESCO. Institute for Information Technologies in Education (2011). Policy Brief – Digital Natives: How do They Learn? How to Teach Them? http://iite.unesco.org/pics/publications/en/files/3214698.pdf.
WOODALL, Stephen (2014). “Radical Publishing: The Organization and Distribution of Art, Literature and Information in the 21st Century.” Eds. Dennis Reidsma, Insook Choi e Robin Bargar. Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment. Cham: Springer. 123-127.
YOO, Hyun-Joo (2007). Text, Hypertext, Hypermedia. Ästhetische Möglichkeiten der digitalen Literatur mittels Intertextualität, Interaktivität und Intermedialität. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.
Published
2016-07-11
How to Cite
CORRÊA, Alamir Aquino.
Portabilidade, Evanescências e Rubricas: Discussões em torno da Literatura Digital na Sala de Aula.
MATLIT: Materialities of Literature, [S.l.], v. 4, n. 2, p. 233-253, july 2016.
ISSN 2182-8830.
Available at: <http://impactum-journals.uc.pt/matlit/article/view/2251>. Date accessed: 18 jan. 2019.
doi: https://doi.org/10.14195/2182-8830.
Section
Secção Temática | Thematic Section
Keywords
digital literature in the classroom; pedagogy for the teaching of digital literature; portability; evanescence; guidelines
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
MATLIT embraces full open access to all issues. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. The article can be quoted but not changed and presented differently.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- A CC licensing information in a machine-readable format is embedded in all articles published by MATLIT.
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
- NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measuresthat legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
