The Interlocutor in Print and Digital Fiction: Dialogicity, Agency, (De-)Conventionalization

  • Astrid Ensslin University of Alberta

Abstract

Digital fiction typically puts the reader/player in a cybernetic dialogue with various narrative functions, such as characters, narrative voices, or prompts emanating from the storytelling environment. Readers enact their responses either verbally, through typed keyboard input, or haptically, through various types of physical interactions with the interface (mouseclick; controller moves; touch). The sense of agency evoked through these dialogic interactions has been fully conventionalized as part of digital narrativity. Yet there are instances of enacted dialogicity in digital fiction that merit more in-depth investigation under the broad labels of anti-mimeticism and intrinsic unnaturalness (Richardson, 2016), such as when readers enact pre-scripted narratees without, however, being able to take agency over the (canonical) narrative as a whole (Dave Morris’s Frankenstein), or when they hear or read a “protean,” “disembodied questioning voice” (Richardson, 2006: 79) that oscillates between system feedback, interior character monologue and supernatural interaction (Dreaming Methods’ WALLPAPER). I shall examine various intrinsically unnatural examples of the media-specific interlocutor in print and digital fiction and evaluate the extent to which unconventional interlocutors in digital fiction may have anti-mimetic, or defamiliarizing effects.

Keywords

digital fiction, unnatural narrative, anti-mimetic, interlocutor, dialogicity

  • Abstract viewed = 124 times
  • PDF viewed = 32 times
  • HTML viewed = 14 times

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALBER, Jan (2013). “Unnatural Narrative.” The Living Handbook of Narratology. Ed. Peter Hühn et al. Ham-burg: Hamburg University. 26 Feb. 2018. http://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/article/unnatural-narrative.

ALBER, Jan (2016). Unnatural Narrative: Impossible Worlds in Fiction and Drama. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

BELL, Alice (2017). “Interactional Metalepsis and Unnatural Narratology.” Narrative 24.3: 294-310.

BELL, Alice, Astrid Ensslin, Dave Ciccoricco, Jess Laccetti, Jessica Pressman, and Hans Rustad (2010). “A [S]creed for Digital Fiction.” Electronic Book Review. 26 Feb. 2018. http://www.electronicbookreview.com/thread/electropoetics/DFINative.

BEN-ARIE, Udi (2009). “The Narrative-Communication Structure in Interactive Narrative Works.” Interactive Storytelling. ICIDS 2009. Ed. I. A. Iurgel, N. Zagalo, and P. Petta. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5915. Berlin: Springer. 152-162.

BIOWARE (2009-2014). Dragon Age. Series. Redwood City, CA: Electronic Arts.

CHATMAN, Seymour (1978). Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca and London: Cornell UP.

DREAMING METHODS (2015). WALLPAPER. 26 Feb. 2018. http://WALLPAPER.dreamingmethods.com/.

ENSSLIN, Astrid (2014). Literary Gaming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

ENSSLIN, Astrid and Alice Bell (forthcoming, subject to manuscript review). Unnatural Narrative and Digital Fiction. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.

FIEGUTH, Rolf (1973). “Zur Rezeptionslenkung bei narrativen und dramatischen Werken.” Sprache im technischen Zeitalter, 47:186-201.

FLUDERNIK, Monika (1996). Towards a “Natural” Narratology. London: Routledge.

IVERSEN, Stefan (2013). “Unnatural Minds.” A Poetics of Unnatural Narrative. Ed. J. Alber, H. Skov Nielsen and B. Richardson. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press. 94-112.

JAHN, Manfred (2017). Narratology: A Guide to the Theory of Narrative. English Department, University of Cologne. 26 Feb. 2018. http://www.uni-koeln.de/~ame02/pppn.htm.

JANIK, Dieter (1973). Die Kommunikationsstruktur des Erzählwerks. Ein semiologisches Modell. Bebenhausen: Rotsch.

LABOV, William (1972). Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P.

MARINO, Mark C. (2006). I, Chatbot: The Gender and Race Performativity of Conversational Agents. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Riverside.

MATEAS, Michael and Andrew STERN (2005). Façade: A One Act Interactive Drama. 26 Feb. 2018. http://www.interactivestory.net/.

MORRIS, Dave (2012). Frankenstein. Cambridge: Inkle Studios.

PFISTER, Manfred (1972). Das Drama. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.

RICHARDSON, Brian (2006). Unnatural Voices: Extreme Narration in Modern and Contemporary Fiction. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.

RICHARDSON, Brian (2016). Unnatural Narrative: Theory, History, and Practice. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.

SHORT, Emily (2000). Galatea. 26 Feb. 2018. https://emshort.blog/my-work/.

SOBCHACK, Vivian C. (1995). “Phenomenology and the Film Experience.” Viewing Positions: Ways of Seeing Film. Ed. L. Williams. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. 36-58.
Published
2018-08-10
How to Cite
ENSSLIN, Astrid. The Interlocutor in Print and Digital Fiction: Dialogicity, Agency, (De-)Conventionalization. MATLIT: Materialities of Literature, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 3, p. 21-34, aug. 2018. ISSN 2182-8830. Available at: <http://impactum-journals.uc.pt/matlit/article/view/5288>. Date accessed: 17 dec. 2018.
Section
Secção Temática | Thematic Section