The Interlocutor in Print and Digital Fiction: Dialogicity, Agency, (De-)Conventionalization
Digital fiction typically puts the reader/player in a cybernetic dialogue with various narrative functions, such as characters, narrative voices, or prompts emanating from the storytelling environment. Readers enact their responses either verbally, through typed keyboard input, or haptically, through various types of physical interactions with the interface (mouseclick; controller moves; touch). The sense of agency evoked through these dialogic interactions has been fully conventionalized as part of digital narrativity. Yet there are instances of enacted dialogicity in digital fiction that merit more in-depth investigation under the broad labels of anti-mimeticism and intrinsic unnaturalness (Richardson, 2016), such as when readers enact pre-scripted narratees without, however, being able to take agency over the (canonical) narrative as a whole (Dave Morris’s Frankenstein), or when they hear or read a “protean,” “disembodied questioning voice” (Richardson, 2006: 79) that oscillates between system feedback, interior character monologue and supernatural interaction (Dreaming Methods’ WALLPAPER). I shall examine various intrinsically unnatural examples of the media-specific interlocutor in print and digital fiction and evaluate the extent to which unconventional interlocutors in digital fiction may have anti-mimetic, or defamiliarizing effects.
digital fiction, unnatural narrative, anti-mimetic, interlocutor, dialogicity
- Abstract viewed = 88 times
- PDF viewed = 8 times
- HTML viewed = 2 times
ALBER, Jan (2016). Unnatural Narrative: Impossible Worlds in Fiction and Drama. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
BELL, Alice (2017). “Interactional Metalepsis and Unnatural Narratology.” Narrative 24.3: 294-310.
BELL, Alice, Astrid Ensslin, Dave Ciccoricco, Jess Laccetti, Jessica Pressman, and Hans Rustad (2010). “A [S]creed for Digital Fiction.” Electronic Book Review. 26 Feb. 2018. http://www.electronicbookreview.com/thread/electropoetics/DFINative.
BEN-ARIE, Udi (2009). “The Narrative-Communication Structure in Interactive Narrative Works.” Interac-tive Storytelling. ICIDS 2009. Ed. I. A. Iurgel, N. Zagalo, and P. Petta. Lecture Notes in Computer Sci-ence, vol. 5915. Berlin: Springer. 152-162.
BIOWARE (2009-2014). Dragon Age. Series. Redwood City, CA: Electronic Arts.
CHATMAN, Seymour (1978). Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca and London: Cornell UP.
DREAMING METHODS (2015). WALLPAPER. 26 Feb. 2018. http://WALLPAPER.dreamingmethods.com/.
ENSSLIN, Astrid (2014). Literary Gaming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
ENSSLIN, Astrid and Alice Bell (forthcoming, subject to manuscript review). Unnatural Narrative and Digital Fiction. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
FIEGUTH, Rolf (1973). “Zur Rezeptionslenkung bei narrativen und dramatischen Werken.” Sprache im technischen Zeitalter, 47:186-201.
FLUDERNIK, Monika (1996). Towards a “Natural” Narratology. London: Routledge.
IVERSEN, Stefan (2013). “Unnatural Minds.” A Poetics of Unnatural Narrative. Ed. J. Alber, H. Skov Nielsen and B. Richardson. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Press. 94-112.
JAHN, Manfred (2017). Narratology: A Guide to the Theory of Narrative. English Department, University of Cologne. 26 Feb. 2018. http://www.uni-koeln.de/~ame02/pppn.htm.
JANIK, Dieter (1973). Die Kommunikationsstruktur des Erzählwerks. Ein semiologisches Modell. Bebenhausen: Rotsch.
LABOV, William (1972). Language in the Inner City: Studies in the Black English Vernacular. Philadelphia: U of Pennsylvania P.
MARINO, Mark C. (2006). I, Chatbot: The Gender and Race Performativity of Conversational Agents. PhD Dissertation, University of California, Riverside.
MATEAS, Michael and Andrew STERN (2005). Façade: A One Act Interactive Drama. 26 Feb. 2018. http://www.interactivestory.net/.
MORRIS, Dave (2012). Frankenstein. Cambridge: Inkle Studios.
PFISTER, Manfred (1972). Das Drama. Munich: Wilhelm Fink.
RICHARDSON, Brian (2006). Unnatural Voices: Extreme Narration in Modern and Contemporary Fiction. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
RICHARDSON, Brian (2016). Unnatural Narrative: Theory, History, and Practice. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.
SHORT, Emily (2000). Galatea. 26 Feb. 2018. https://emshort.blog/my-work/.
SOBCHACK, Vivian C. (1995). “Phenomenology and the Film Experience.” Viewing Positions: Ways of Seeing Film. Ed. L. Williams. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press. 36-58.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
MATLIT embraces online publishing and open access to back issues. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. The article can be quoted but not changed and presented differently.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- A CC licensing information in a machine-readable format is embedded in all articles published by MATLIT.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measuresthat legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.