Melissus as a critic of Parmenides: a mimetic rivalry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/1984%20-249X_22_1Keywords:
Parmenides, Melissus, Doxa, Eleatism, MonismAbstract
A long historical tradition has set the survey of Melissus’ thought on the basis of the comparison with Par-menides. In fact, it seems impossible to talk about the first without reference to the second. Thus, it was rarely doubted that Melissus was an Eleatic, at least honoris causa. Classical-ly, the comparison between the two philosophers has taken the form of an analysis of differences between the charac-ters of the objects of their deductions. Recently, more so-phisticated analyses focusing on further elements of differ-ence have been proposed. Nonetheless, additional points for comparison still remain, usually neglected, which allow us to hold that Melissus’ philosophy was neither the distorted and trivializing interpretation of Parmenides’ poem, nor an attempt to improve the eleatism. Based on the data presented here, it is reasonable to recognize in Melissus a thinker in conflict with Parmenides, albeit sharing some assumptions. Melissus’ procedure appears, in fact, as an attempt to replace the teaching of Parmenides with a new self-sufficient doc-trine that partly takes on the same formal features (to the point of being almost confused with its model) but none-theless possesses a different theoretical value and advances a quite different vision of reality. This strategy can be regard-ed as partially successful, at least with respect to its ancientreception.
Downloads
References
BICKNELL, P.J. (1982). Melissus’ Way of Seeming?. Phronesis 27, p. 194-201. https://doi.org/10.1163/156852882X00122
BREMOND, M. (2015). Melissus’s so called refuta-tion of mixture. Rhizomata 3, p. 143-158. https://doi.org/10.1515/rhiz-2015-0008
DE SIMONE, G. (2016). Gli aspetti della cosmolo-gia parmenidea in 28 B10 DK. Lexicon Philosophicum 4, p. 43-64.
DROZDEK, A. (2001). Eleatic Being: Finite or In-finite?. Hermes nº129, p. 306-313.
GILBERT, O. (1909). Ionier und Eleaten. Rheini-sches Museum für Philologie nº64, p. 185-201.
GRAESER, A. (1972). The Argument of Melissus. Athens, Hellenic Society for Humanistic Studies.
JOUANNA, J. (1965). Rapports entre Mélissos de Samos et Diogène d’Apollonie à la lumière du traité hippocratique. De Natura hominis. Revue des Études anciennes 67, p. 306-323. https://doi.org/10.3406/rea.1965.3751
KECHAGIA, E. (2011). Plutarch against Colotes. A Lesson in the History of Philosophy. Oxford-New York, Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199597239.001.0001
LOENEN, J.H.M.M. (1959). Parmenides, Melissus, Gorgias. A Reinterpretation of Eleatic Philosophy. As-sen, Royal VanGorcum Ltd.
MANSFELD, J.et al. (2016). Melissus between Mi-letus and Elea. A cura di M. Pulpito. Sankt Augustin, Academia Verlag.
PALMER, J. (2001). A New Testimonium on Dio-genes of Apollonia, with Remarks on Melissus’ Cos-mology. Classical Quarterly 51, p. 7-17. https://doi.org/10.1093/cq/51.1.7.
PALMER, J. (2004). Melissus and Parmenides. In: Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 26, p. 19-54.
PULPITO, M. (2011). Parmenides and the Forms. In: CORDERO, N.-L. (ed.). Proceedings of the Interna-tional Symposium: ‘Parmenides, Venerable and Awe-some’ (Plato, Theaetetus 183e). Las Vegas, Parmenides Publishing, p. 191-212.
PULPITO, M. (2016). Lo Straniero di Samo. In: MANSFELD, J. (2016), p. 9-67.
RAPP, C. (2013). Melissos von Samos. In: BRE-MER, D.; FLASHAR, H.; RECHENAUER, G. (eds.). Ueberweg - Grundriss der Geschichte der Philosophie, Philosophie der Antike, Vol. 1: Frühgriechische Philoso-phie. Basel, Schwabe, p. 573-598.
REALE, G. (1970). Melisso. Testimonianze e fram-menti. Firenze, La Nuova Italia.
REINHARDT, K. (1959). Parmenides und die Ge-schichte der griechischen Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main, Klostermann. (1 ed. Bonn 1916).
SEDLEY, D. (1999). Parmenides and Melissus. In: LONG, A.A. (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Early Greek Philosophy. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 113-133. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521441226.006.
TARÁN, L. (1979). Perpetual Duration and Atem-poral Eternity in Parmenides and Plato.The Monist 62, p. 43-53. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist19796214
VITALI, R. (1973). Melisso di Samo: sul mondo o sull’essere. Una interpretazione dell’eleatismo. Urbino, Argalìa.
ZAFIROPULO, J. (1950). L’École éléate: Parménide, Zénon, Mélissos. Paris, Les Belles Lettres.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Massimo Pulpito
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.
1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.
