Cuncta quatiam: Medea shakes the elements
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_22_10Keywords:
Medea, Seneca, Theatre, Philosophy, VirtueAbstract
The morally aporetic end of Seneca’s Latin Medea puzzles the reader of the play. After having killed her two sons in an act of vengeance against Jason, the mythic female figure is raised to the heavens on a winged chariot toward a triumphal exit. How come that the repudiated and enraged woman turns out to be a kind of heroine for the Stoic playwright? It happens that for him virtus is not measured by good actions in the battlefield, but as a mental disposition to face ill fortune. In a range of occasions Seneca writes about the virtuous human being and his/her consistency of character. We deal in this article with Seneca’s Letter 120 on epistemology, the philosophical piece De providentia and the plays Medea and Hercules Furens in an attempt to elucidate the process through which the barbarous princess regains her identity, far from men, closer to the gods.
Downloads
References
AHL, Frederick (1986). Seneca. Medea. (translated with an introduction). Ithaca, Cornell University Press.
BARTSCH, Shadi (2006). The Mirror of the Self: Sexuality, Self-Knowledge, and the Gaze in the Early Roman Empire. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
COVINGTON, Coline (1989). In search of the Her- oine. Journal of Analytical Psychology no34, p.243-254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-5922.1989.00243.x
FITCH, John G. (2002) (ed.). Seneca. Tragedies. Londres, Harvard University Press.
FYFE, Helen (1983). An analysis of Seneca’s Medea. In: BOYLE, A. J. (ed.). Seneca Tragicus: Ramus Essays on Senecan Drama. Berwick, Vitoria, p. 77-93. https:// doi.org/10.1017/S0048671X00003647
HINE, H. M. (2000). Seneca. Medea. (Introduc- tion, translation and commentary). Warminster, Aris & Phillips.
KOTT, Jan (2003). Shakespeare nosso contemporâ- neo. Tradução de Paulo Neves. São Paulo, Cosac & Naify.
LIEBERMAN, Wolf-Lüder (2014). Medea. In: DAMSCHEN, G.; HEIL, A. (eds.) Brill’s Companion to Seneca: Philosopher and Dramatist. Leiden, Brill, p. 459-474.
MARTI, B. (1945). Seneca’s tragedies: A new inter- pretation. TAPA n.o 76, p. 216-45.
REALE, Giovani. (2015) Estoicismo, ceticismo e ecletismo. Tradução de Marcelo Perine. São Paulo, Edições Loyola.
RICHTER, Daniel S. (2011). Cosmopolis: Imagin- ing Community in Late Classical Athens and the Early Roman Empire. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
RILEY, Kathleen (2008). The Reception and Per- formance of Euripides’ Herakles: Reasoning Madness. Oxford, Oxford University Press. https://doi. org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199534487.001.0001
ROLLER, Matthew B. (2001). Constructing Au- tocracy: Aristocrats and Emperors in Julio-Claudian Rome. Princeton, Princeton University Press.
ROLLER, Matthew B. (2015). Precept(or) and Example in Seneca. In: WILLIAMS, G.; VOLK, K. (eds.) Roman Reflections: Studies in Latin Philosophy. Oxford, Oxford University Press, p.129-156. https:// doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199999767.003.0007
SLATTER, J. (2014). Pequeno esboço sobre a pro- hairesis e a dignidade humana em Epiteto. Archai, n.o12, jan-jun, p. 113-119.
SCHIESARO, A. (2009). Seneca and the denial of the self. In: BARTSCH, S.; WRAY, D. (eds). Seneca and the Self. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, p. 221-235.
SILK, M. S. (1985). Heracles and Greek Tragedy. Greece & Rome 32, p.1-22. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0017383500030096
VIEIRA, Trajano (2009). Sófocles. Eurípides. Electra(s) (tradução). São Paulo, Ateliê.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Renata Cazarini de Freitas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.
1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.
