Plotinus, Proclus and the Arabic Neoplatonism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_35_27Keywords:
Arabic neoplatonism, historiography, Plotinus, Proclus, al-KindiAbstract
In this text, I present a historiographical debate about the Arabic Neoplatonism from some assumptions since the 19th century. From the editions of the works and the posterior studies, the distinction between the Plotinian corpus in Arabic, the Plotiana arabica, and the Proclean corpus, the Procliana arabica, was consolidated, given the way in which the relationship between the texts originally written in Arabic and their Greek sources was understood. However, in view of recent studies, different assumptions and methodologies have been adopted. Given the complexity of the discussion, in this text I will restrict myself to the analysis of two works originally written in Arabic, namely The Theology of Aristotle and the Discourse on the Pure Good, known as Liber de causis. Starting from the critique of two traditionally accepted historiographical assumptions, the aim of the following analysis is to discuss how new approaches allow us a more unified understanding of the nature of the Arabic Neoplatonic corpus. A consequence of the distinction between the Plotinus arabus and the Proclus arabus is to lock the texts into philosophical models that are different from those found in the works themselves.
Downloads
References
Edições
(1955a). Al-Aflaṭūnīyah al-Muḥdathah ʿindā al-ʿArab. Ed. ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Badawī. Al-Qahirah.
(1955b). Plotinus apud arabes. Theologia Aristotelis et fragmenta quae supersunt. Ed. ʿAbd al-Raḥmān al-Badawī. Cairo.
BEKKER, I. (1987 [1831]). Aristotelis Opera, ex recensione I. B., edidit Academia Regia Borussica, editio altera quam curavit O. Gigon.
ENDRESS, G. (1973). Proclus Arabus: zwanzig Abschnitte aus der Institutio thelogica in arabischer Ubersetzung. Beirut, In Kommission bei Franz Steiner, Wiesbaden.
PATTIN, A. (1966). Le liber de causis. Édition établie à l'aide de 90 manuscrits avec introduction et notes. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 28 (1).
TAYLOR, R, C. (1981). The Liber de Causis (Kalām fī Maḥḍ al-Khair). A Study of Medieval Neoplatonism. A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Toronto.
Traduções
(2010). A Teologia de Aristóteles. Volume XIII, Tomo 2. Tradução do árabe, introdução e notas de C. Belo. Lisboa: Centro de Filosofia da Universidade de Lisboa, Imprensa Nacional.
(1950). Liber de Causis. Trad. O. P. Anawati, Université de Montréal, Institut d’Etudes Médiévales.
(2000). O Livro das Causas: Liber de Causis. Tradução e Introdução de Jan Gerard Joseph ter Reegen. Porto Alegre: EDIPUCRS.
AL-KINDI. (2006). A Filosofia Primeira. Edição do texto árabe, tradução, e notas por Miguel Attie Filho e Safa A. C. Jubran. Tiraz.
ADAMSON, P.; PORMANN, P. E. (2002). The Philosophical Works of Al-Kindi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ARISTOTLE. (1953 [1924]). Metaphysics. A Revised Text with Introduction and Commentary by W. D. Ross, 2 voll. Oxford.
ARISTÓTELES. (2005). “Metafísica de Aristóteles. Livro XII”. Trad. L. Angioni. Cad. Hist. Fil. Ci., Campinas, Série 3, v. 15, n. 1, p. 201-221.
PLOTINO. (2000). Enneadi. Testo greco a fronte. A cura di Giuseppe Faggin. Milano: R.C.S. Libri S.p.A.
PROCLUS. (1963 [1933]). The Elements of Theology. A Revised Text with Translation, Introduction and Commentary by E. R. Dodds, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
TAYLOR, R, C. (1981). The Liber de Causis (Kalām fī Maḥḍ al-Khair). A Study of Medieval Neoplatonism. A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Toronto.
Bibliografia secundária
ADAMSON, P. (2015). Neoplatonism: The Last Ten Years. The International Journal of the Platonic Tradition, 9, p. 205-220.
ADAMSON, P. S. (2000). The Arabic Plotinus: A Study of the “Theology of Aristotle” and Related Texts. Dissertation, University of Notre Dame.
ADAMSON, P. S. (2002). The Arabic Plotinus. A Philosophical Study of the Theology of Aristotle. London: Gerald Duckworth and Co. Ltd.
ADAMSON, P. S. (2007). “The Kindian Tradition. The Structure of Philosophy in Arabic Neoplatonism”. In: D’ANCONA, C. (ed.), The Libraries of the Neoplatonists. Leiden: Brill, p. 351-370.
ADAMSON, P. (2024 [2021]). “The Theology of Aristotle”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2021 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/theology-aristotle/>.
ADAMSON, P.; PORMANN, P. E. (2002). The Philosophical Works of Al-Kindi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ANAWATI, G. C. (1956). “Prolégomènes à une nouvelle édition du De causis arabe (Kitab al-hayr al-mahd)”. Mélanges Louis Massignon, Damas: Institut Français de Damas, p. 73-110.
BOULNOIS, O. (2022). “Deux modèles de causalité, deux théories de la
liberté: À propos de deux interprétations de la
proposition i du Livre des causes”. In: CALMA, D. (ed.) Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes. Vol. 3. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, p. 338-370.
CALMA, D. (Ed.) (2019). Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes, Volume 1, Western Scholarly Networks and Debates. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
CALMA, D. (Ed.) (2021). Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes, Volume 2, Translations and Acculturations. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
CALMA, D. (Ed.) (2022). Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes, Volume 3. On Causes and the Noetic Triad. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
CHASE, M. (2021). “Porphyry and the Theology of Aristotle”. In: CALMA, D. (Ed.) Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes, Volume 2. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, p. 157-181.
CORBIN, H. (2019). “Theology of Aristotle”. Kronos, Philosophical Journal, vol. viii, p. 24-29.
D’ANCONA, C. (ed.) (2007). The Libraries of the Neoplatonists. Leiden, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV.
D’ANCONA, C. C. (1992). “La Doctrine de la Création ‘Mediante Intelligentia’ dans le Liber de Causis et dans ses Sources. Revue Des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques, 76(2), p. 209-233.
D’ANCONA, C. C. (1995). Recherches sur le Liber de Causis. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.
D’ANCONA, C. C. (2014). The Liber de Causis. In: GERSH, S. (ed.) Interpreting Proclus. From Antiquity to Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 137-61.
D’ANCONA, C. C. (2001). Theology of Aristotle. Chapter 1: Structure and Compostion. Oriens, 36, 2001, p. 78-112.
ENDRESS, G. (1997). The Circle of al-Kindi. Early Arabic Translations from the Greek and the Rise of Islamic Philosophy. In: ENDRESS, G., KRUK, R. (eds.) The ancient tradition in Christian and Islamic Hellenism. Studies on the transmission of Greek philosophy and sciences dedicated to H.J. Drossaart Lulofs on his ninetieth birthday, p. 43-76.
GERSH, S. (ed.) (2014). Interpreting Proclus. From Antiquity to the Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
GUTAS, D. (2002). The Study of Arabic Philosophy in the Twentieth Century an Essay on the Historiography of Arabic Philosophy. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 29 (1), p. 5-25
JOLIVET, J. (1979). Pour le dossier du Proclus arabe: Al-Kindi et la “Theologie platonicienne.” Studia Islamica, (49), 55, p. 55-75.
KRAUS, P. (1940). Plotin chez les Arabes. Remarques sur un nouveau fragmente de la parafrase árabe des Ennéades. Bulletin de L’Institut d’Égypte, 23-2, p. 263-295.
LIBERA, Alain de. (2004 [1998). A filosofia medieval. 2. ed. São Paulo: Loyola.
PEREIRA, R. H. de S. (org.). (2007). Busca do Conhecimento. Ensaios de Filosofia Medieval no Islã. São Paulo: Paulus.
RIGGS, T. (2017). On the Absence of the Henads in the Liber de Causis: Some Consequences for Procline Subjectivity. In: BUTORAC, D. D., LAYNE, D. A. (eds.) Proclus and his Legacy. Berlin/Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH, p. 289-310.
ROSENTHAL, F. (1952). Ash-Shaykh al-Yunani and the Arabic Plotinus Source, Orientalia, 21, p. 461-493.
SWEENEY, L. (1959). Research difficulties in the Liber de Causis. The Modern Schoolman, 36, p. 109-116.
SOMMA, B. (2022). The Causal Efficacy of Nature in the Neoplatonica Arabica. In: CALMA, D. (ed.) Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes. Vol. 3. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, p. 281-302.
STEEL, C. (2022). Substantia stans per essentiam suam: Proclus et l’auteur du De causis sur les êtres qui se constituent eux-mêmes. In: CALMA, D. (ed.) Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes. Vol. 3. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, p. 37-59.
TAYLOR, R. C. (1992). A Critical Analysis of the Structure of the Kalam fi Mahd al-Khair (Liber de causis). In: MOREWEDGE, P. (ed.), Neoplatonism and Islamic Thought, Albany, NY, p. 11-40.
TAYLOR, R. C. (1978). A Note on Chapter I of the Liber de causis. Manuscripta XII, p. 169-172.
TAYLOR, R. C. (2021). Contextualizing the Kalam fi mahd al-khair/Liber de causis. In: CALMA, D. (ed.) Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes. Volume 2, Translations and Acculturations. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, p. 211-232.
VLAD, M. (2022). L’Être Premier – Entre Proclus et Denys L’Aréopagite. In: CALMA, D. (ed.) Reading Proclus and the Book of Causes. Vol. 3. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.
ZIMMERMANN, F. (1994). Proclus Arabus Rides Again. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy, vol. 4, p. 9-51.
WAKELNIG, E. (2007). Proclus in Aristotelian Disguise. Notes on the Arabic Transmission of Proclus’Elements of Theology. In: MUSCTO, A. et al. (eds.) Universalità della ragione. XII Congresso Internazionale di Filosofia Medievale de la SIEPM Palermo 17-22 settembre 2007 vol. III, Palermo, Officina di Studi Medievali, p. 165-176.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Meline Costa Sousa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.
1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.
