Knowledge and Virtue in Plato's Meno

Authors

  • Franco Ferrari Università degli Studi di Salerno, Salerno, Itália

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_12_8

Keywords:

virtue, knowledge, teachers of virtue, opinion

Abstract

The theme of the nature of virtue and its transmissibility runs through almost all the early dialogues of Plato, that is, the so-called “Socratic dialogues.” It acquires a central importance in the Protagoras and Meno, which opens with the question about the way to acquire virtue. During the dialogue, virtue assumes a highly political significance: Meno asks Socrates how we can achieve success in the political field, as we might acquire social recogni-tion. The thesis around which the conversation develops assumes the identity of virtue and knowledge (episteme). However, the consequence which follows from the assump-tion of this thesis, that is, the principle according to which virtue, because knowledge, is teachable is refuted by the famous “empirical argument”: the absence of men able to transmit the their virtues to their children shows that it is not teachable, and therefore not knowledge. Socrates then proposes to locate the source of political virtue in correct opinion (orthe doxa). However, the empirical validity of the argument is highly uncertain, since it seems to be based on the ambiguity of the meaning of the term didakton, which means both “teachable” and actually “taught”. Even the attempt to establish virtue on theia moira should be treated with some skepticism. In fact, Socrates alludes at the end of the dialogue, to the possibility that there is a man who is virtuous and who is also able to teach virtue to another man: this extraordinary man is naturally Socrates himself.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BARNES, J. (1991) Enseigner la vertu? Revue philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger,n. 116, p. 571 - 589.BLÖSSNER, N. (2011) The Unity of Plato’s Meno. Reconstructing the Author’s Thoughts, Philologus, n. 155, p. 39 - 68.BRUNSCHWIG, J. (1991) Pouvoir enseigner la vertu? Revue philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger,n.116, p. 591 - 602.BONAZZI, M. (2010) Platone, Menone.Torino, Einaudi. CAMBIANO, G. (1971) Platone e le tecniche, Torino, Einaudi.CHARLES, D. (2006) Types of Definition in the Meno. In: JUDSON, L & KARASMANIS, V. (eds.), Remembering Socrates. Oxford, Clarendon Press, p. 110 - 128.DEVEREUX, D. (1978) Nature and Teaching in Plato’s Meno. Phronesis, n. 23, p. 118 - 26.DIMAS, P. (2007) Teachers of Virtue. Ancient Philosophy,n. 27, p. 1 - 23.ERLER, M. (1991) Il senso delle aporie nei dialoghi di Platone. Esercizi di avviamento al pensiero filosofico, Milano, Vita e Pensiero, Milano, (orig. Berlin-New York 1987).FRONTEROTTA, F. (2011) Υπόθεσις e διαλέγεσθαι. Metodo ipotetico e metodo dialettico in Platone. In: LONGO, A. (ed.), Argument from Hypothesis in ancient Philosophy, Napoli, Bibliopolis, p. 43 - 74.IONESCU, C. (2007) Plato’s ‘Meno’. An Interpretation. New York, Toronto, Roman & Littlefield Publishers, Lanham.KAHN, C. (2008) Platone e il dialogo socratico. L’uso filosofico di una forma letteraria. Milano, Vita e Pensiero, (orig. Cambridge 1996).NEHAMAS, A. (1985) Meno’s Paradox and Socrates as a Teacher. OSAPh, n. 3, p. 1 - 30.PERIN, C. (2012) Knowledge, Stability, and Virtue in the Meno.Ancient Philosophy, n. 32, p. 15 - 34.SCOTT, D. (2006) Plato’s Meno. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.SHARPLES, R. W. (1985) Plato, Meno, edited with Translation and Notes, Warminster, Aris & Phillips Publishers.WEISS, R. (2001) Virtue in the Cave. Moral Inquiry in Plato’s ‘Meno’. Oxford,Oxford University Press.WILKES, K.V. (1979) Conclusions in the Meno. AGPh, n. 61, p. 143 - 153.

Published

2025-11-29

How to Cite

Ferrari, F. (2025). Knowledge and Virtue in Plato’s Meno. Revista Archai, (12), 77. https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_12_8