Virtue, Deception, and Knowledge in Plato's Hippias Minor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_12_9Keywords:
Virtue, knowledge, sincerity, duplicity, sophistryAbstract
The Lesser Hippias presents the conversation that takes place at the conclusion of a conference held by Hippias on Homeric poems to a number of people. Socrates wants to interrogate the sophist about a particular aspect of his Homeric exegesis, that of the description of the characters of Achilles and of Ullysses: the first, the more simple and sincere (or veracious, haploustatos kaì alethéstatos) would be better than the last, who is double (polútropos). The simplicity of Achilles should reveal sincerity, while the duplicity (or rather the multiplicity, polú-tropos) of Ullyses would indicate an ambiguous character and deceiver. So it seems that to him who knows plenty belongs the capacity of deceiving, precisely by using his multitude of knowledge, while sincerity would constitute a specific trait of him who, not possessing lots of knowledge, can only reveal himself for what he is. The ethical paradox that derivates from this will be examined by means of an analysis of the arguments developed in the dialogue.
Downloads
References
BALAUDÉ, J.-F. (1998) Que veut montrer Socrate dans l’Hippoas mineur? In: GIANNANTONI, G, & NARCY, M. (ed.), Lezioni socratiche. Naples, Bibliopolis, p. 261-77.CALOGERO, G. (1984) Introduzione all’ Ippia minore (1938). In: CALOGERGO, G., Scritti minori di filosofia antica. Naples, Bibliopolis, p. 284-92.ZYSKIND, H.; STERNFELD, R. (1976) Plato’s Meno 89c: ‘Virtue is knwoledge’ a hypothesis?. Phronesis, n. 21/2, p. 130-134.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Francesco Fronterotta

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.
1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.








