Law and Political Expertise in Plato’s Statesman
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_34_S3Keywords:
Plato, Statesman, Laws, Legal Norms, Political Expertise, Nomos, ParticularismAbstract
Remarks made by the Eleatic Visitor at Statesman 293a-300e are often read as implying that laws are hopelessly defective in comparison with expert political knowledge. Specifically, laws seem inadequate to the task of capturing the variability, mutability, and finely-grained detail of human life (294a6-b7). On the other hand, the Visitor endorses a strict form of law-abidingness for non-ideal constitutions. The tension between these positions has greatly exercised scholars. In this paper, I argue for a reading on which (1) the political expert, no less than laws, must rely on “rougher methods,” i.e. generalizations across individual cases; (2) law-making is a constitutive part of the statesman’s expertise; (3) laws are necessary for political communities and their value exceeds the merely instrumental or heuristic.
Downloads
References
ANNAS, J.; WATERFIELD, R. (1995). Plato: Statesman Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
BERGES, S. (2010). Understanding the Role of the Laws in Plato’s Statesman Prolegomena: Časopis za filozofiju 9.1, p. 5-20.
DANCY, J. (2004). Ethics Without Principles Oxford, Clarendon Press.
DIMAS, P.; LANE, M; SAUVÉ MEYER, S. (eds.) (2021). Plato’s Statesman: A Philosophical Discussion Oxford, Oxford University Press.
DWORKIN, R. (1978). Taking Rights Seriously Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
FOWLER, H. (1925). Plato: Statesman . London, Heinemann.
GUTHRIE, W. (1978). A History of Greek Philosophy: The Later Plato and the Academy Vol 5. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press .
HITZ, Z. (2009). Plato on the Sovereignty of Law. In BALOT, R. (ed.) A Companion to Greek and Roman Political Thought Malden, Blackwell, p. 367-381.
HORN, C. (2021a). What Makes and Law Good? Plato on Legal Theory in the Statesman” Filosoficky casopis 2021/22, p. 88-102.
HORN, C. (2021b). Ruling With (and Without) Laws. Satesman 297b5-303d3.” In DIMAS, P.; LANE, M; SAUVÉ MEYER, S. (eds.), p. 176-194.
IRWIN, T. (2000). Ethics as an Inexact Science: Aristotle’s Ambitions for Moral Theory.” In Moral Particularism HOOKER, B.; LITTLE, M. (eds.) Oxford, Oxford: University Press, p. 100-129.
LANE, M. (1998). Method and Politics in Plato’s Statesman Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
MCDOWELL, J.(1979) Virtue and Reason. The Monist 62.3, p. 331-350.
RAZ, J. (2009). The Authority of Law: Essay on Law and Morality Oxford, Clarendon Press.
REID, J. (2017). Imitations of Virtue: Plato and Aristotle on Non-Ideal Constitutions Dissertation.
ROWE, C. (2006). The Treatment of Non-Ideal Constitutions in the Politicus Philosophical Inquiry 28.1-2, p. 105-121.
ROWE, C. (2005). The Treatment of Non-Ideal Constitutions in the Politicus: Further Considerations. Plato Journal 5, p. 1-13.
ROWE, C. (2001). Killing Socrates: Plato’s Later Thoughts on Democracy. Journal of Hellenic Studies 121, p. 63-76.
ROWE, C. (2000). The Politicus and Other Dialogues. In The Cambridge History of Greek and Roman Political Thought ROWE, C; SCHOFIELD, M. (eds.) Cambridge, Cambridge University Press , p. 233-257.
ROWE, C. (1999). Plato: Statesman . Indianapolis, Hackett Publishing.
ROWE, C. (1994). Bad and Appalling Constitutions in Plato’s Statesman Polis 13.1-2, p. 119-132.
SAMARAS, A. (2002). Plato on Democracy New York: P. Lang.
SKEMP, J. B. (1952). Plato: Statesman . New Haven, Yale University Press.
SØRENSEN, A. (2022). The Second Best City and its Laws in Plato’s Statesman Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 104.1, p. 1-25.
SØRENSEN, A. (2018). Political Office and the Rule of Law in Plato’s StatesmanPolis 35.2, p. 401-417.
SPELIOTIS, E. (2011). Phronesis and Law in Plato’s Statesman Ancient Philosophy 31, p. 295-310.
TRIVIGNO, F. (2021). Above the Law and Out for Justice. 291a1-297b4. In DIMAS, P.; LANE, M; SAUVÉ MEYER, S. (eds.) Plato's Statesman: A Philosophical Discussion.Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Catherine McKeen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Given the public access policy of the journal, the use of the published texts is free, with the obligation of recognizing the original authorship and the first publication in this journal. The authors of the published contributions are entirely and exclusively responsible for their contents.
1. The authors authorize the publication of the article in this journal.
2. The authors guarantee that the contribution is original, and take full responsibility for its content in case of impugnation by third parties.
3. The authors guarantee that the contribution is not under evaluation in another journal.
4. The authors keep the copyright and convey to the journal the right of first publication, the work being licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License-BY.
5. The authors are allowed and stimulated to publicize and distribute their work on-line after the publication in the journal.
6. The authors of the approved works authorize the journal to distribute their content, after publication, for reproduction in content indexes, virtual libraries and similars.
7. The editors reserve the right to make adjustments to the text and to adequate the article to the editorial rules of the journal.
