The search for the distinctively human good — Ethica Eudemia 1217a18-40

Authors

  • André Luiz Cruz Sousa Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (Brasil)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_20_11

Keywords:

Eudemian Ethics, Eudaimonia, Human good, Action, god

Abstract

The paper studies the discussion about human good in Eudemian Ethics I.7. It is particularly concerned with the existence, in the text, of two characteristics of the human good: its peculiarity, on the one hand, which consists not only in the qualification ‘human’ (anthropinon), but also in the assignment of this good to the domain of action (the activity that distinguishes humans from other beings), and, on the other hand, the fact that it belongs to a spectrum containing the goods of other beings, like god and the remaining living beings. Divinity works as the standard for the distinction between eudaimonic goods ”“ belonging to beings whose nature implies participation in the divine (humans, for example) ”“ and non-eudaimonic goods that belong to those beings deprived of such participation. Resorting to other passages from the Eudemian Ethics, as well as other texts from the corpus, the paper defends that the two characteristics of the human good presented in EE I.7 foreshadow an important difference between the two Aristotelian treatises on eudaimonia: whereas the Nicomachean Ethics emphasizes contemplation as the activity through which humans participate in the divine, the Eudemian Ethics stresses virtuous actions as a human activity related to the divine.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BEKKER, I. (1831). Aristoteles Graece. Berlin, Aca-demia Regia Borussia.BUDDENSIEK, F. (1999). Die Teorie des Glücks in Aristoteles Eudemischer Ethik. Göt-tingen, Vandenhoeck&Ruprecht. https://doi.org/10.13109/9783666252228

BYWATER, I. (1894) (ed.). Aristotelis Ethica Nicomachea. Oxford, Oxford Classical Texts.

DIRLMEIER, F. (1962). Merkwürdige Zitate in der Eudemischen Ethik des Aristoteles. Heidelberg, Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.

_______ (1984) (ed.). Aristoteles. Eudemische Ethik. Übersetzt und Kommentiert. Berlin, Akademie Verlag.

GAUTHIER, R.A.; JOLIF, Y.J. (2002) (ed.). Aris-tote. L’ Éthique à Nicomaque. Tome II – Premiére Partie. Commentaire. Livres I-V. Louvain-La-Neuve, Éditions Peeters.

_________. Aristote. L’ Éthique à Nicomaque. Tome II – Deuxième Partie. Commentaire. Livres VI-X. Louvain-La-Neuve, Éditions Peeters.

GIGON, O. (1971). Das Prooimion der Eu-demischen Ethik. In: MORAUX, P.; HARLFIN-GER, D. (eds.). Untersuchungen zur Eudemischen Ethik. Berlin, Walter de Gruyter & Co. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110853872.93

HICKS, R. D. (1907) (ed). Aristotle. De Anima with translation, introduction and notes. Cambridge Uni-versity Press.

HÖFFE, O. (2005) (ed.). Aristoteles-Lexikon. Stutt-gart, Alfred Kröner Verlag. JAEGER, W. (1957) (ed.). Aristotelis Metaphysica. Oxford, Oxford Classical Texts.

KENNY, A. (2011) (ed.). Aristotle. $e Eudemian Ethics. Oxford, Oxford World’s Classics. ROSS, W. D. (1956) (ed.). Aristotelis De Anima. Oxford, Oxford Classical Texts.

STEWART, J.A. (1892). Notes on the Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle. Oxford at the Clarendon Press.

TRICOT, J. (2000) (ed.). Aristote. La Métaphysique. Tome II. Introduction, notes et index. Paris, Librairie Philosophique J Vrin.

WALZER, R.R.; MINGAY, J.M. (1991) (ed). Aristo-telis Ethica Eudemia. Oxford, Oxford Classical Texts.

WOODS, M. (1992) (ed.). Aristotle. Eudemian Ethics. Books, I, II and VIII. Translated with a com-mentary. Oxford, Clarendon Press.

Published

2017-05-02

How to Cite

Sousa, A. L. C. . (2017). The search for the distinctively human good — Ethica Eudemia 1217a18-40 . Revista Archai, (20), 289. https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_20_11