The Sequel, Building reuse in Lisbon: the case of Modern Cinema Theatres [1904-1957
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8681_6_6Abstract
As a consequence of technical evolution, consumerism and mobility, a number of buildings were abandoned despite their location, function or building condition. A prominent example is the cinema theatre, a Modern programme par excellence that had already lost its raison d’être by the end of the 20th century. This paper concerns a sample of 40 cinemas in Lisbon which were built until the start of regular television broadcasting in 1957. After the essential characterization of the venues, based on recent studies, the reuse of these cinemas is analysed from a purely functional point of view. This essay presents some answers and opens a discussion about the reuse of these buildings.
The reuse of buildings is a prominent urban problem, in particular in European cities. Reuse is a common and useful word that names a wide range of situations: conversions, adaptive reuse, and rehabilitation, even occupation (Tostões 2014, Tostões 2015a).
The relevance of the study of cinema reuse is due to the innovative contribution for the development of Architecture (Alves 2014). Moreover, cinemas were the background of important cultural and social events and therefore part of our collective memory and urban heritage. In Lisbon, as in many other European capital cities, cinemas became paradigmatic urban places of great social value due to the educative role in particular for the illiterate, as a gathering leisure space in the city and the political role as a propaganda medium. The specificities of Portuguese cinema theatres are related to the dictatorship politics and backwardness: the greatest theatres were built by the end of the 1950s, while in central Europe this happened by the end of the 1930s. Only in the 21st century the first studies concerning cinema architecture in Portugal have been published, but none really investigates what happened after their closure.
Visits, classification of the building condition and organization of the information into tables allow to have a panorama of the situation, characterized by a wide number of gutting and disrespectful interventions. After this quantitative analysis, the Cinema Ideal case, as the only to be maintained as a regular cinema, as well as some representative case-studies namely the Monumental, the Capitólio, Eden and Cinearte are highlighted in this paper.Downloads
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Open Access
Authors who publish in this journal agree to the following terms:
A. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
B. Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
C. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
D. Securing permission to publish illustrations and other graphic data under copyright in the journal is the authors' responsibility.