Socratic Dialectic between Philosophy and Politics in Euthydemus 305e5-306d1

  • Carrie Swanson

Abstract

In the final scene of the Euthydemus, Socrates argues that because the art of speechwriting merely partakes of the two good arts philosophy and politics, it places third in the contest for wisdom. I argue that this curious speech is a reverse eikos argument, directed at the speechwriters own eikos argument for the preeminence of their art. A careful analysis of the partaking relation reveals that it is rather Socratic dialectic which occupies this intermediate position between philosophy and politics. This result entails that Socrates’ peculiar art is only a part of philosophy, and its practitioner only partially wise.

Keywords

Euthydemus, partaking argument, rhetoric, sophistry

  • Abstract viewed = 48 times
  • PDF viewed = 49 times

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2019-07-15
How to Cite
SWANSON, Carrie. Socratic Dialectic between Philosophy and Politics in Euthydemus 305e5-306d1. PLATO JOURNAL: The Journal of the International Plato Society, [S.l.], v. 19, p. 43-90, july 2019. ISSN 2183-4105. Available at: <https://impactum-journals.uc.pt/platojournal/article/view/6805>. Date accessed: 24 aug. 2019.
Section
Papers