The so-called “unwritten doctrines” of Plato: some notes on the historiographical problem from the beginning until today

Authors

  • Rodolfo Lopes Universidade de Brasilia (Brasil)
  • Gabriele Cornelli Universidade de Brasilia (Brasil)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_18_7

Keywords:

Plato, unwritten doctrines

Abstract

This article intends to reconstruct the historiographical problem of Plato's oral teachings: the so-called "unwritten doctrines". In parallel with the Dialogues, there is strong textual evidence of an oral transmission that many philologists try to track since the end of 18th century. The purpose of this article is, thus, to analyze not only the central passages and testimonia but also the main conjectures held by modern scholars on this subject, in order to sketch out the two resulting historiographical poles. On the one hand, some scholarship argues for the philological validity of Plato's oral transmission and suggests that the theoretical positions attributed to him by those texts correspond to the authentic platonism (casting the Dialogues to a secondary plan). On the other hand, there are some modern authors that fully reject such claim, holding that there is no philological validity whatsoever in the textual tradition.

This article is conceived as the first step of a wider project on Plato's unwritten doctrines. Its main purpose is, thus, to provide a crosschecked reading of those two contrasting historiographical models, from which we may (in a second article) propose a wider position about the problem of Plato's unwritten doctrines.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

BRisson, L. (2008) (org.). Platon. Oeuvres Com-plètes. Paris, Flammarion. BURneT, J. (1914). Greek Philosophy (Part I: from Thales to Plato). London, MacMillan & Co. CHeRniss, H. (1944). Aristotle’s Criticism of Plato and the Academy I. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins Press._(1945). The Riddle of the Early Academy. Berkeley, University of California Press._(1966). Die ältere Akademie: ein historisches Rät-sel und seine Lösung. Heidelberg, Winter.CoRneLLi, G. (2016). onde está Platão? A Academia de Atenas no tempo de Platão como lugar de ausências. in: soARes, C; CAsADesÚs BoRDoY, F.; FiALHo, M. C. (eds). Redes culturais nos primórdios da Europa: 2400 anos da fundação da Academia de Platão. Coimbra, imprensa da Universi-dade de Coimbra, p. 69 -86. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/10316.2/38821 (acessado em 25 de Março de 2016)DÖnT, e. (1967). Untersuchungen zu den plato-nischen Briefen, zu Platons «Ungeschriebener Lehre und zur Epinomis des Philipp von Opus. Wien, H. Böhlaus.FeRRARi, F. (2007). La chora nel Timeo di Platone. Riflessioni su «materia» e «spazio» nell’ontologia del mondo fenomenico. Quaestio 7, p. 3 -23.

_(2012). Tra metafisica e oralità. il Platone di Tub-inga. in: eRLeR, M. & nesCHKe -HenTsCHKe, A. (eds.). Argumenta in Dialogos Platonis (II: Platon-interpretation und ihre Hermeneutik vom 19. bis 21. Jahrhundert:). Basel, schwabe Verlag, p. 361 -391.GAiseR, K. (1959). Protreptik und Paränese bei Platon. Untersuchungen Zur Form des Platonischen Dialogs. stuttgart, Kohlhammer.isnARDi PARenTe, M. (1984). il Platone «non scritto» e le autotestimonianze. Alcune note a prop-osito di un livro recente. Elenchos 1, p. 201 -209.JAeGeR, W. (1912). Studien zur Entstehungsges-chichte der Metaphysik. Berlin, Weidmann. KRÄMeR, H. (1959). Arete bei Platon und Aristo-teles: zum Wesen und Geschichte der platonischen On-tologie. Heidelberg, Winter.ReALe, G. (1984). Per una rilettura e una nuova interpretazione di Platone. Milano, CUsL.

_(1986). Per una nuova interpretazione di Platone. Rilettura della metafisica dei grandi dialoghi alla luce delle «Dottrine non scritte». Milano, CUsL.

_(2008). Autotestimonianze e rimandi dei Dialoghi di Platone alle “Dottrine non scritte”. Milano, Bompi-ani.RiCHARD, M. -D. (2008). L’insegnamento orale di Platone. Raccolta delle testimonianze sulle «Dottrine non scritte» con analisi e interpretazione. Milano, Bompiani.

RoBin, L. (1908). La Théorie platonicienne des Idées et des Nombres d’après Aristote. Étude historique et critique. Paris, Félix Alcan. _(1935). Platon. Paris, Félix Alcan. Ross, D. (1951). Plato’s Theory of Ideas. oxford, Clarendon Press.

sHoReY, P. (1903). The Unity of Plato’s Thought. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.

SZLeZÁK, TH. (1985). Platon und die Schriftli-chkeit der Philosophie. Berlin, De Gruyter.

_(2004). Das Bild des Dialektikers in Platons späten Dialogen. Berlin, De Gruyter.TAYLoR, A. (1926). Plato. The Man and His Work. London, Methuen & Co. Ltd.TenneMAnn, W. (1792). System der platonischen Philosophie. Leipzig, Barth.TRenDeLenBURG, A. (1826). Platonis de ideis et numeris, doctrina ex Aristotele illustrata. Lipsiae, Vogel.VLAsTos, G. (1963). on Plato’s oral Doctrine. Review of H. J. Krämer Arete bei Platon und Aristo-teles. Gnomon 35, p. 641 -655.

Published

2016-08-25

How to Cite

Lopes, R., & Cornelli, G. (2016). The so-called “unwritten doctrines” of Plato: some notes on the historiographical problem from the beginning until today. Revista Archai, (18), 259. https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_18_7