Law and the Janus-faced Morality of Political Correctness
Keywords:political correctness, juridical comparability, free speech, counterstorytelling;, Mark Tushnett, Stanley Fish
This introduction explores the relationship between Law and Political Correctness (PC), considering different stages (from culture wars on campus to narrative outsider jurisprudences), as well as diverse (contextually instable and often contradictory) narrative webs. This reflective path opens three main different problems: the first concerns the way how the sensitivity to political correctness is programmatically (contingently) pursued through statutory law; the second identifies the difficulties which plurality and fragmentation create, when we consider Law’s vocation for comparability; the third denounces specific institutionalizing procedures and social effects associable to the culture of political correctness. Acknowledging that the integrated discussion of these themes, in their juridical systematic implications, is fundamentally encore à faire, the last part of the text introduces in detail the seven chapters which follow, highlighting the stimulant plurality of perspectives and approaches which they manifest.
Adler, L. (2011). Gay Rights and Lefts: Rights Critique and Distributive Analysis for Real Law Reform, School of Law Faculty Publications, paper 36. http://hdl.handle. net/2047/d20001230 [Also published in Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 46 (1) (Amicus). https://harvardcrcl.org/cr-cl-presents-a-colloquium-
Adler, L. (2018). Gay Priori: A Queer Critical Legal Studies Approach to Law Reform. Durham: Duke University Press Books.
Bartholet, E. (2018, January 16). #MeToo Excesses. The Harvard Crimson. https://www. thecrimson.com/article/2018/1/16/bartholet-metoo-excesses/
Bhatia, A. (2012). The South of the North: Building on Critical Approaches to International Law with Lessons from the Fourth World. Oregon Review of International Law, 14 (1), 131-175.
Brest, P. (1992). The Disorderly University: A Reply to Mark Tushnet. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 4 (2), 381-389.
Browne, A. (2006). The retreat of reason: political correctness and the corruption of public debate in modern Britain. London: Civitas.
Butler, J. (1999). Introducing “There’s no such thing as free speech…”. In H. A. Veeser (Ed.), The Stanley Fish reader (145-147). Malden: Blackwell Publishers.
Clarke, J. A. (2019). The Rules of #MeToo. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 2019, article 3. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol2019/iss1/3
Delgado, R. (1993). The Inward Turn in Outsider Jurisprudence. William & Mary Law Review, 34 (3), 741-768.
Delgado, R. (2000). Storytelling for oppositionists and others: A plea for narrative. In R. Delgado & J. Stefanic (Eds.), Critical Race Theory: The Cutting Edge (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Delgado, R. & Stefancic, J. (2001). Critical Race Theory: an Introduction. New York and London: New York University Press.
Derrida, J. (1992). Force of Law: The “mystical foundations of authority” (1989). In D. Cornell, M. Rosenfeld, D. G. Carlson (Eds.), Deconstruction and the possibility of Justice (3-67). New York/London: Routledge.
Fish, S. (1994). There’s no such thing as free speech and it’s a good thing, too. Oxford/ New York: Oxford University Press.
Fish, S. (1995). Professional correctness: literary studies and political change. Cambridge (Mass)/London: Harvard University Press.
Frankenberg, G. (2006). Partisanen der Rechtskritik: Critical Legal Studies, etc. In S. Buckel, R. Christensen, A. Fischer-Lescano (Eds.), Neue Theorien des Rechts (97- 116). Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius.
Hartman, A. (2015). A war for the soul of America: a History of the Culture Wars. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hughes, G. (2010). Political correctness: a history of semantics and culture. Malden/ Oxford/Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Linhares, J. M. A. (2020). Exemplarity as concreteness, or the challenge of institution- alising a productive circle between past and present, old and new. In A. Condello (Ed.), New Rhetorics for contemporary legal discourse (83-100). Edinburgh: Ed- inburgh University Press.
Matsuda, M. (1989). Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim’s Story. Michigan Law Review, 87, 2320-2381.
Minda, G. (1995). Postmodern Legal Movements. Law and Jurisprudence at Century’s End. New York/ London: New York University Press.
Roth, P. (2000). The Human Stain. Thorndike: Thorndike Press.
Santos, B. S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice Against Epistemicide. London/ New York: Routledge.
Tushnet, M. (1992). Political Correctness, the Law, and the Legal Academy. Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities, 4 (1), 127-163. https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1061&context=yjlh.
White, J. B. (1999). From expectation to experience: Essays on Law and legal imagination, Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
White, J. B. (2019). Keep Law Alive. Durham: Carolina Academic Press.
Copyright (c) 2021 Undecidabilities and Law
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.