Heritage Strikes Back
The Al Mahdi Case, ICC’s Policy on Cultural Heritage and the Pushing of Law’s Boundaries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/2184-9781_2_5Keywords:
Cultural heritage, heritage protection, International Criminal Court (ICC), UNESCO, Rome Statute, Al MahdiAbstract
Images of genocide, mass graves and torn families come to mind when one hears the term ‘war crime’. But does cultural heritage have similar legal rights? Is it protected by the Rome Statute? What lays in the future of cultural heritage protection against destruction? And where do the boundaries of law lie with regards to the rights of cultural objects? The purpose of this paper is to answer these questions by focusing on the 2016 International Criminal Court’s (ICC) judgement in the Al Mahdi case and the analysis of the 2021 ICC’s Policy on Cultural Heritage born in its wake, which will shape our perception of the cultural heritage protection in the years to come. In the first, introductory part of the paper the author ponders upon the concept of cultural heritage, trying to understand why it matters. In turn, the second part of the article focuses on the investigation of the many faces of interactions between cultural heritage and law. The third part of the paper is devoted to the analysis of the Al-Mahdi case heard before the ICC. The author explains how the case was brought before the ICC and the way in which the Court reached its now precedential decision, showing the various ways in which it pushed the boundaries of law and our understanding of what constitutes a war crime. In the fourth part of the paper the author turns his attention to the Policy on Cultural Heritage proposed by the ICC in June 2021 in close collaboration with UNESCO, looking into the new paths it puts forward for cultural heritage. The concluding part of the paper is focused on the question of what the ICC’s Policy means for the future of the prosecution of the crimes against cultural heritage, with the author asking whether it may be an effective tool and deterrent in fighting against the destruction of world’s heritage, and wondering how the rights of monuments may be further broadened in the coming years.
Downloads
References
Badar M, Higgins N (2017) Discussion Interrupted: The Destruction and Protection of Cultural Property under International Law and Islamic Law and the Case of Prosecutor v Al Mahdi. International Criminal Law Review 17(3):486-516
Bagott P-L (2020) How to solve a problem like Al Mahdi: proposal for a new crime of ‘attacks against cultural heritage’. In: Fraser J, McGonigle Leyh B (eds) Intersections of law and culture at the International Criminal Court. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/Northampton, MA
Bishop-Burney US (2017) Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi. The American Journal of International Law 111(1):126-132
Blue Shield International (2019) International Committee of the Blue Shield (ICBS). Available via Blue Shield International. https://theblueshield.org/about-us/history/international-committee-of-the-blue-shield-icbs/. Accessed 10 Oct 2021
Buis EJ (2020) Aristotle in The Hague: Artistic Pleading and Emotional Theatricality in International Criminal Proceedings. AJIL Unbound 114:133-137
Capone F (2018) An Appraisal of the Al Mahdi Order on Reparations and Its Innovative Elements. Redress for Victims of Crimes against Cultural Heritage. Journal of International Criminal Justice 16:645-661
Chiarini G (2021) Negotiated Justice in the ICC: Following the Al Mahdi case, a Proposal to Enforce the Rights of the Accused. Available via Global Justice Journal. https://globaljustice.queenslaw.ca/news/negotiated-justice-in-the-icc-following-the-al-mahdi-case-a-proposal-to-enforce-the-rights-of-the-accused. Accessed 10 Oct 2021
Chiricioiu V (2017) Two ‘Firsts’ at the International Criminal Court: The Al Mahdi Case and Its Implications. NRDO - The New Journal of Human Rights 2:5-18
Cole DM (2017) From the Hague to Timbuktu: The Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi; A Consequential Case of Firsts for Cultural Heritage and for the International Criminal Court. Temple International and Comparative Law Journal 31(2):397-462
Dachlan R (2018) Constructing Victims of Heritage Destruction: Lessons from the Al Mahdi Reparations Order. University of Cambridge, Cambridge
de Clippele M-S (2021) Does the Law Determine What Heritage to Remember?. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 34:623-656
Dijkstal HJ (2019) Destruction of Cultural Heritage before the ICC. The Influence of Human Rights on Reparations Proceedings for Victims and the Accused. Journal of International Criminal Justice 17:391-412
Esterling SE, John-Hopkins M (2018) The Creation and Protection of History through the Prism of International Criminal Justice in Al Mahdi. Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies 9:1-60
Ferrazzi S (2021) The Notion of “Cultural Heritage” in the International Field: Behind Origin and Evolution of a Concept. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 34:743-768
Girard LF (1998) Conservation of cultural and natural heritage. Evaluations for good governance and democratic control. In: Lichfield N, Barbanente A, Borri D, Khakee A, Prat A (eds) Evaluation in Planning. Facing the Challenge of Complexity. Springer Science+Business Media, Dordrecht, pp 25-50
Günay MT (2019) Looking Humanity in the Eye and Seeing its Loss in the Eyes of the ICC: An Evaluation of Daesh’s Destruction of Palmyra using the Gravity Assessment Made by the ICC Prosecutor in the Al Mahdi Case. Santander Art and Culture Law Review 2:245-266
Halbwachs M (1980) The Collective Memory. Harper Colophon Books, New York
Haux HD, Maget Dominicé A, Raspoting JA (2021) A Cultural Memory of the Digital Age?. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 34:769-782
ICC (2018) Case Information Sheet. Situation in the Republic of Mali. The Prosecutor v. Ahmad Al Faqi Al Mahdi. ICC-01/12-01/15. ICC, The Hague
Independent (2014) Is Unesco damaging the world's treasures?. Available via Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/travel/news-and-advice/unesco-damaging-world-s-treasures-1675637.html. Accessed 10 Oct 2021
Johnsen SYR (2017) Wilful Destruction of Cultural Property as the Principal Charge before the ICC. The Al Mahdi Case and the Gravity Threshold for Admissibility. Universitetet I Bergen, Bergen
Jokilehto J (2006) World Heritage: Defining the outstanding universal value. City and Time 2(2):1-10
Lanciotti A (2021) Cultural Heritage in International Law: (Still) Looking for a Definition? The Taxonomy of Cultural Heritage Across the Spectrum of UNESCO Conventions and Beyond. In: Niglio O, Yong Joong Lee E (eds) Transcultural Diplomacy and International Law in Heritage Conservation A Dialogue between Ethics, Law, and Culture. Springer, Singapore, pp 191-208
Lostal M (2017) The Misplaced Emphasis on the Intangible Dimension of Cultural Heritage in the Al Mahdi Case at the ICC. Inter Gentes 1(2):46-58
Loulanski T (2006) Revising the Concept for Cultural Heritage: The Argument for a Functional Approach. International Journal of Cultural Property 13:207-233
Massue JP, Schvoerer M (2001) Module BI-4/C. Protection of Cultural Heritage. EUR-OPA and IOM-OIM, Strasbourg/Geneva
Mathias S (2021) Prosecuting Crimes Against Culture: The Contributions of the Al- Mahdi and Ntaganda Cases to the ICC Approach to Cultural Property Protections. Emory International Law Review Recent Developments 35:58-75
Meskell L (2015) Introduction: Globalizing Heritage. In: Meskell L (ed.) Global heritage: a reader. Wiley Blackwell, Chichester/Malden, MA, pp 1-21
Meskell L, Brumann C (2015) UNESCO and New World Orders. In: Meskell L (ed.) Global heritage: a reader. Wiley Blackwell, Chichester/Malden, MA, pp 22-42
Ndoro W (2015) Heritage Laws: Whose Heritage Are We Protecting?. The South African Archaeological Bulletin 70(202):136-137
Neumann T (2018) The ICC’s Reparations Order in re Al Mahdi – Three Remarks on Its Relevance for the General Discussion on Reparations. ZAOERV - Heidelberg Journal of International Law 615-620
OTP (2019) Strategic Plan 2019-2021. International Criminal Court – Office of the Prosecutor
OTP (2021) Policy on Cultural Heritage. International Criminal Court – Office of the Prosecutor
Pinton S (2020) The ICC Judgement in Al Mahdi: Heritage Communities and Restorative Justice in the International Criminal Protection of Cultural Heritage. Seattle Journal for Social Justice Volume 19(1):347-386
Roman E (2019) The Journey of Cultural Heritage Protection as a Common Goal for Human Kind: Rosenberg to Al-Mahdi. Groningen Journal of International Law 7(1):112-123
Rossi P (2017) The “Al Mahdi” Trial Before the International Criminal Court: Attacks on Cultural Heritage Between War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity. Diritti Umani e Diritto Internazionale 11(1):87-100
Sadowski MM (2017) Urban Cultural Heritage: Managing and Preserving a Local Global Common in the Twenty-first Century. Journal of Heritage Management 2(2):125-151
Sadowski MM (2018) Cultural Heritage and the City: Law, Sustainable Development, Urban Heritage, and the Cases of Hong Kong and Macau. Romanian Journal of Comparative Law 8(2):208-245
Sadowski MM (2020) City as a Locus of Collective Memory. Streets, Monuments and Human Rights. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie – The German Journal of Law and Society 40(1-2):209-240
Schabas W (2017) Al Mahdi Has Been Convicted of a Crime He Did Not Commit. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 49(1):75-102
Scovazzi T (2021) International Legal Instruments as a Means for the Protection of Cultural Heritage. In: Niglio O, Yong Joong Lee E (eds) Transcultural Diplomacy and International Law in Heritage Conservation A Dialogue between Ethics, Law, and Culture. Springer, Singapore, pp 155-167
Skrzypaszek JA (2012) Intangible heritage and its role in the formation of social and personal identity. In: Amoêda R, Lira S, Pinheiro C (eds) Heritage 2012. 3rd International Conference on Heritage and Sustainable Development. Green Lines Institute for Sustainable Development, Barcelos, pp 1491-1497
Sterio M (2017) Individual Criminal Responsibility for the Destruction of Religious and Historic Buildings: The Al Mahdi Case. Case Western Reserve Journal of International Law 49:63-73
Vecco M (2010) A definition of cultural heritage: From the tangible to the intangible. Journal of Cultural Heritage 11:321-324
Verdu G, Karro K (2012) Heritage as bearer of memory. In: Amoêda R, Lira S, Pinheiro C (eds) Heritage 2012. 3rd International Conference on Heritage and Sustainable Development. Green Lines Institute for Sustainable Development, Barcelos, pp 339-347
Wagner P (2000) From monuments to human rights: redefining « heritage » in the work of the Council of Europe. In In: Council of Europe (ed.) Forward planning: The function of cultural heritage in a changing Europe. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, pp 9-27
Wangkeo K (2003) Monumental Challenges: The Lawfulness of Destroying Cultural Heritage During Peacetime. Yale Journal of International Law 28(1):183-274
Weber R (2000) Introduction. In: Council of Europe (ed.) Forward planning: The function of cultural heritage in a changing Europe. Council of Europe, Strasbourg, pp 5-7
Wierczyńska K, Jakubowski A (2017) Individual Responsibility for Deliberate Destruction of Cultural Heritage: Contextualizing the ICC Judgment in the Al-Mahdi Case. Chinese Journal of International Law 16(4):695-721
Wijesuriya G (2010) Conservation in context. In: Falser MS, Lipp W, Tomaszewski A (eds) Conservation and Preservation. Interactions between Theory and Practice. In memoriam Alois Riegl (1858-1905). Edizioni Polistampa, Florence, pp 233-247
Zeidler K, Łągiewska M (2021) Liberalism Versus Communitarianism in Cultural Heritage Law. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique 34:657-668
