#VivaLaFrida: Naming Frida Kahlo as tecnodiscursive performance in digital plataforms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14195/2182-8830_10-1_9Keywords:
Digital Humanities, Latin America, Data Feminism, Intellectual Women, Frida Kahlo.Abstract
The article is based on the theoretical-methodological framework of Digital Humanities in Latin America, Data Feminism, and Technocultural Critical Discourse Analysis to examine Twitter posts about Frida Kahlo in Spanish and Portuguese between 2009 and 2023. Through extraction and processing methodologies and quantitative and qualitative methods using Wolfram Mathematica and Python in Jupyter Notebooks, we examine the following aspects: the historical flow of tweets, the most frequent hashtags, and the most mentioned usernames. Subsequently, we create word clouds. We identify three main modalities through which the practices of naming Frida Kahlo constitute activist performances that make catalyse the constitution of communities and counter-communities, affirming and maintaining identities in Latin America. Firstly, naming Frida Kahlo becomes an expression of belonging to the Latin American, Hispanic-American, and/or Mexican world. Secondly, Frida Kahlo makes visible and mobilizes social movements, whether in the direction of feminism, LGBTQIA+ rights, or disability rights. Thirdly, naming Frida Kahlo mobilizes sales performances, recommendations, or adherence to the consumption of objects and products from various commercial spheres. However, the audience does not have a passive attitude towards this phenomenon of commodification around Frida Kahlo; on the contrary, the author becomes the core of conflicts between opposing positions. In these ways, naming Frida Kahlo allows for the construction of positions around community identities, Latin American identity, sexuality, and gender, and enables diverse interventions in the market of cultural consumption.
Downloads
References
ANDERSEN, Margaret; COLLINS, Patricia Hill (2016). Race, Class & Gender. An Anthology. Boston: Cengage Learning.
ANKORI, Gannit; PARDES, Ilana; GINSBERG, Ruth (2006). “Moses, Freud and Frida Kahlo.” In PARDES, Ilana (ed.). New Perspectives on Freud’s “Moses and Monotheism”. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.
BAILEY, Moya (2015). #transform(ing)DH Writing and Research: An Autoethnography of Digital Humanities and Feminist Ethics. Digital Humanities Quarterly, v. 9, n. 2. Disponível em: http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/9/2/000209/000209.html
BENJAMIN, Ruha (2019). Race After Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. NY: Polity Press.
BLAY, Eva Alterman; AVELAR, Lúcia (2017). 50 Anos de Feminismo: Argentina, Brasil e Chile: A construção das mulheres como atores políticos e democráticos. São Paulo: EDUSP.
BROCK, André (2020). Distributed Blackness. African American Cybercultures. New York: New York University Press.
CALLAWAY, Elizabeth. et al (2020). The Push and Pull of Digital Humanities: Topic Modeling the “What is digital humanities?” Genre. Digital Humanities Quarterly, v. 14, n. 1. Disponível em: https://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/14/1/000450/000450.html
CÁRCAMO, Mirna Paiz (2017). Rosa María o la mujer en la guerrilla (en Rosa María: Una mujer guerrillera. Relatos de la insurgencia guatemalteca en los años sesenta, 2015). In GUZMÁN, Alejandra de Santiago; BORJA, Edith Caballero; ORTUÑO, Gabriela González (eds.). Mujeres Intelectuales: Feminismos y Liberación en América Latina y el Caribe. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.
CASTRO, Celso (2020). Dossiê Humanidades Digitais. Estudos Históricos, v. 33, n. 69. Disponível em: https://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/reh/issue/view/4179
COSTA, Julia Lourenço; BARONAS, Roberto Leiser (2020). Feminismos em Convergências: Discurso, Internet e Política. Coimbra: Grácio Editor.
DAFLON, Verônica Toste; SORJ, Bila (2021). Clássicas do Pensamento Social. Mulheres e Feminismos no Século XIX. Rio de Janeiro: Rosa dos Tempos.
DATAREPORTAL (2023). Twitter Statistics and Trends. 19 de fevereiro de 2023. Disponível em: https://datareportal.com/essential-twitter-stats
D’ANDREA, Carlos (2020). Pesquisando Plataformas Online: Conceitos e Métodos. Salvador: EDUFBA.
DEL RIO RIANDE, Gimena; FIORMONTE, Domenico (2022). The Peripheries and Epistemic Margins of Digital Humanities. In O’SULLIVAN, James (ed.). The Bloomsbuy Handbook to Digital Humanities. London: Bloombsbury. Disponível em: https://www.aacademica.org/gimena.delrio.riande/204
D’IGNAZIO, Catherine; KLEIN, Lauren F. (2020). Data Feminism. Cambridge: MIT Press.
FERNÁNDEZ L’HOESTE, Héctor; RODRÍGUEZ, Juan Carlos (eds.) (2020). Digital Humanities in Latin America. Gainesville: University Press of Florida.
FRIEDMAN, Elisabeth Jay (2017). Interpreting the Internet: Feminist and Queer Counterpublics in Latin America. Los Angeles: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520284494.001.0001
GALLO, Ruben (2015). Freud’s Mexico: Into the Wilds of Psychoanalysis. Cambridge: MIT Press.
GUEDES DE MELLO, Anahi (2020). “Frida Kahlo era quadruplamente defiça”. 3 de setembro de 2020. Twitter. Disponível em: https://twitter.com/anahigm75/
status/1301613805428932614
HOCHMAN, Gilberto; LIMA, Nísia Trindade (2015). Médicos Intérpretes do Brasil. São Paulo: Hucitec.
HOLLANDA, Heloisa Buarque de (ed.) (2020). Pensamento Feminista Hoje: Perspectivas Decoloniais. Rio de Janeiro: Bazar dos Tempos.
JOSIOWICZ, Alejandra (2020). Gênero e história. Estudos Históricos, v.33, n. 70, p. 221-226. Disponível em: https://periodicos.fgv.br/reh/article/view/81280
___ (2021a). Humanidades Digitais e Leitura no Twitter: “Um placebo sanador em tempos de covid-19”. Estudos Históricos, v. 34, n. 73, pp. 343-366. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/S2178-149420210207
___(2021b). A performatividade do nomear no Twitter: Contrapúblicos digitais antirracistas e feministas no Brasil. Aletria: Revista de Estudos de Literatura, v. 31, n. 4, pp. 209-237. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/aletria/article/view/34548
LAUDANO, Claudia Nora (2019). #NiUnaMenos en Argentina. Activismo digital y estrategias feministas contra la violencia hacia las mujeres. In NATHANSOHN, G.; ROVETTO, F. (eds.). Internet e Feminismos: Olhares sobre violências sexistas desde América Latina. Bahia: EdUFBA. Disponível em: https://www.memoria.fahce.
unlp.edu.ar/libros/pm.3711/pm.3711.pdf
LEE, Monica; MARTIN, John Levi (2015). Coding, counting and cultural cartography.
American Journal of Cultural Sociology, v. 3, p. 1-33. Disponível em: https://doi.
org/10.1057/ajcs.2014.13
MICELI, Sergio; MYERS, Jorge (2019). Retratos Latino-Americanos. A Recordação Letrada de Intelectuais e Artistas do Século XX. São Paulo: Edições Sesc São Paulo.
MILAN, Stefania et al (2019). Datafication from Below: Epistemology, Ambivalences, Challenges. Crossing Boundaries. Tecnoscienza: Italian Journal of Science and Technology Studies, v. 10, n. 1, pp. 89-113. Disponível em: http://www.tecnoscienza.net/index.php/tsj/article/view/381
PAVEAU, Anne-Marie (2021). Análise do Discurso Digital. Dicionário das Formas e das Práticas. Campinas: Ed. Pontes.
PIMENTA, Ricardo; ALVES, Daniel (2021). Humanidades digitais e o Mundo Lusófono. Rio de Janeiro: FGV Editora.
RICAURTE, P. (2022). Ethics for the majority world: AI and the question of violence at scale. Media, Culture & Society, v. 44, n. 4, pp. 726-745. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437221099612.
RICAURTE, Paola (2019). Data Epistemologies, The Coloniality of Power, and Resistance. Television & New Media, v. 20, n. 4, pp. 350-365. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476419831640. Acesso em 17-11-2022.
RICAURTE, Paola; CHAUDHURI, Sukanta; FIORMONTE, Domenico (2022). Global Debates in the Digital Humanities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
RISAM, Roopika (2018). New Digital Worlds: Postcolonial Digital Humanities in Theory, Praxis and Pedagogy. Illinois: Northwestern Univ. Press.
RODRÍGUEZ, Ileana; SZURMUK, Mónia (2015). The Cambridge History of Latin American Women’s Literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SILVA, Tarcízio (2020). Comunidades, Algoritmos e Ativismos Digitais: Olhares Afro-Diaspó-ricos. São Paulo: LiteraRUA.
STEVANI GISLETTI, María Vanesa; MONTERO, Claudia (2020). El octubre chileno: voces y luchas feministas. Descentrada, v. 4, n. 1. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.24215/25457284e111.
UNDERWOOD, Ted (2017). A genealogy of Distant Reading. Digital Humanities Quarterly, v. 11, n. 2. Disponível em: https://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/
vol/11/2/000317/000317.html
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Alejandra Josiowicz

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
MATLIT embraces full open access to all issues. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
- A CC licensing information in a machine-readable format is embedded in all articles published by MATLIT.
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.