Concept and Scope of Cultural Heritage Law

Authors

  • José Casalta Nabais Faculdade de Direito da Universidade de Coimbra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14195/2182-2387_6_1

Abstract

1. Some Preliminary Considerations: 1.1. A Terminological Question – the Name of the Discipline: 1.1.1. The choice of the noun heritage; 1.1.2. The choice of the adjective cultural; 1.1.3. Practical reasons for the choice of the expression cultural heritage; 1.1.4. Cultural heritage and cultural goods. 1.2. Cautions Regarding Fundamentalism and Trivialization. 1.3. Cultural Heritage as Everyone’s Concern.

2. Approach to the Notion of Cultural Heritage Law: 2.1. The Idea of Cultural Heritage; 2.2. Reference to the Legal Nature of Cultural Heritage; 2.3. The Idea of Cultural Heritage Law; 2.4. The Relative Diversity of Cultural Heritage Law.

3. Cultural Heritage Law and Related Branches of Law: 3.1. Cultural Heritage Law and Environmental Law; 3.2. Cultural Law and Urban Planning Law; 3.3. Heritage Law and Cultural Law; 3.4. Cultural Heritage Law and Public Heritage Law; 3.5. Cultural Heritage Law and Tourism Law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2000-07-01

Issue

No. 06 (2000): Urbanism, Territorial Order and Environment Studies Center Law Review

Section

Doctrine

License

Copyright (c) 2000 José Casalta Nabais

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows sharing the work with recognition of authorship and initial publication in Antropologia Portuguesa journal.