O BANQUETE DA TEORIA, OU COMO COMBATER A SOLIDÃO

Authors

  • Ricardo Namora Center for Portuguese Literature, University of Coimbra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-847X_1_7

Keywords:

Semiotics, Jan Mukarovsky, Vítor Aguiar e Silva

Abstract

This paper will focus on two different ways of understanding the scope and consequences of the concept of “Semiotics” in the study of literature. The first, endorsed by Mukarovsky, proposes a view of each literary artefact as a “work-thing” that demands two separate levels of semiotic approach. The second, proposed by Aguiar e Silva, seems to embed the concept within a horizontal system of relations to other equally fruitful hermeneutical devices. It will be suggested that the second alternative is more productive than its predecessor.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ricardo Namora, Center for Portuguese Literature, University of Coimbra

Ricardo Namora estudou na Universidade de Coimbra (Licenciatura, 2001; Mestrado, 2010) e na Universidade de Lisboa (Mestrado, 2004; Doutoramento, 2009). É membro do Centro de Literatura Portuguesa da Universidade de Coimbra, unidade de investigação patrocinada pela F.C.T. Os seus interesses incluem teoria da literatura, história da crítica, hermenêutica, biografias e teorias da ficção.

Ricardo Namora holds degrees from the University of Coimbra (BA, 2001; MA, 2010) and from the University of Lisbon (MA, 2004; PhD, 2009). He is a member of the Centre for Portuguese Literature at the University of Coimbra, a research unit sponsored by the F.C.T. His research subjects include literary theory, history of criticism, hermeneutics, biographies and theories of fiction.

Published

2011-07-31