Assessing delusional ideation: A narrative review of self-report instruments

Authors

  • Maria João Martins Cognitive and Behavioural Centre for Research and Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra. Portugal. Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Portugal.
  • Paula Castilho Cognitive and Behavioural Centre for Research and Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra. Portugal.
  • Célia Barreto-Carvalho Cognitive and Behavioural Centre for Research and Intervention, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra. Portugal. Department of Educational Sciences, University of Azores, Portugal.
  • Ana Telma Pereira Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Portugal.
  • Filipa Tróia Community Intervention Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Baixo Vouga Hospital Centre, Portugal.
  • Ondina Matos Community Intervention Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Baixo Vouga Hospital Centre, Portugal.
  • Prazeres Santos Community Intervention Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Baixo Vouga Hospital Centre, Portugal.
  • Tiago Santos Community Intervention Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Baixo Vouga Hospital Centre, Portugal.
  • António Macedo Department of Psychological Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Portugal.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8606_59-2_4

Keywords:

assessment, delusions, psychosis, self-report measures

Abstract

According to recent models of recovery in psychosis, the patients’ perspectives about their own difficulties, symptoms and goals (health-related and in other areas) are of major importance in intervention. Self-report measures have been increasingly studied and several authors have pointed out their validity, reliability and clinical utility in people with psychotic-disorders. The present study sought to review and critically analyse the available self-report instruments for assessing delusions. Four instruments met the inclusion criteria: Characteristics of Delusions Rating Scale; Beliefs Rating Scale; Peters Delusions Inventory; and Conviction of Delusional Beliefs Scale. All scales assess delusions in a multidimensional perspective and present adequate psychometric properties, although with high variability within studies. Refining the psychometric studies of the existing instruments (mainly confirmatory factor analysis, reliability and diagnostic accuracy analyses) and developing new instruments focused on coping are future areas of research interest.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-06

How to Cite

Martins, M. J., Castilho, P., Barreto-Carvalho, C., Pereira, A. T., Tróia, F., Matos, O., Santos, P., Santos, T., & Macedo, A. (2017). Assessing delusional ideation: A narrative review of self-report instruments. Psychologica, 59(2), 61-81. https://doi.org/10.14195/1647-8606_59-2_4

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)